Jump to content

weatherwiz

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    80,250
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by weatherwiz

  1. Kind of interesting but I wonder (at least across Connecticut) if there will be a 1-2 hour window upcoming where we get some breaks in the clouds...enough for some Sun to poke through and ramp up mixing. 925 winds about 40 knots but 50+ moving in.
  2. Yeah I can't believe when I saw that. That is absolutely absurd. Who is coming up with these decisions? These people are becoming ridiculous and should not be holding the positions they do.
  3. It's going to be interesting watching this unfold through the day. There are some interesting differences between the HRRR/NAMs (not even looking at clown maps). We may have just enough instability later on to have an increased likelihood for some widespread 45-50 mph gusts. Widespread 50+...that may be tough.
  4. 3km would be pretty wild today...even back to the CT River
  5. That should fill in over the next few hours as the dynamics increase. Now if we had a scenario of a dry slot when the LLJ was cranking...then we would be game for some big gusts. But I think it's going to be difficult to generate much in the way of bigger gusts today without the aid of convection. But we'll see the NAM does indicate a good deal of convective elements within the rain today so I suppose there will be some isolated higher gusts. Eastern areas though should watch for any line...mesos have a pretty solid looking line going which could produce some 50+ gusts out ahead of it as it moves east-northeast across far eastern Connecticut. Rhode Island, and eastern Mass later on.
  6. Looks like the good gusts today will be Rhode Island and eastern Mass...maybe back into far eastern CT...shocker
  7. wow...IIRC I think guidance had them in the mid 30's and rising this evening but what a bust.
  8. Should be a good deal of convective precip tomorrow which should help in the gust department
  9. Yeah you're right...just went and looked. I realized I never looked at 18z NAM. Even not much different than 12z run...just a little noise
  10. Seems like quite the shift east with the main low on the NAM? Though not sure I want to say shift east...more so a more east develop of the low. Looks like it takes longer for the low to develop?
  11. I just read the last 8 pages of this thread and have zero clue what I read. If someone were to test me on the last 8 pages and to write a few paragraphs detailing what I read, the only words I'd be able to muster are, "W.....T.....F"
  12. Going to be interesting around this window. HRRR generates just enough sfc based instability to warrant the potential for any convection to tap into these winds. I wouldn't be surprised if BDL got close to 50 knots tomorrow.
  13. Definitely no argument with that. If we want to incorporate the CAA aspect that is certainly king
  14. With sfc temps 60-62 and dews 58-59 there is going to be little issues with inversion.
  15. Well just talking about *if* there is anything with a forced line. That would probably be OUR (not talking about eastern sections) BEST chance for maximum wind gust potential. I see tomorrow being windy due to sustained winds but we may struggle to get impressive gusts (above 40-45) because of how much rain there will be which stabilizes things. Just inland away from the immediate shoreline would do better.
  16. Same thing with summer time squall lines...unless you have such an intense line that involves producing a microburst or macroburst or a derecho...the strongest winds are going to be either along the gust front or right at the onset of the heaviest rain. But because there is more instability to work with and stronger downward transfer of momentum you can fluctuate with some very strong gusts while as a setup like this you're more than likely to go calm quickly due to stability.
  17. That's because even after all these years nobody can still seem to grasp the lines themselves don't produce big wind...it is always along the leading edge of the torrential rain. You get a massive gust of wind then a brief lull of quietness then it pours cats and buckets which quickly stabilizes the atmosphere.
  18. Yeah...would probably have to go a bit inland...like interior southeast Mass? a bit away from the water. Looks like the 12z GFS did tick a few degrees warmer too...more in the 60-62F range versus 58-61F...subtle but could be a big difference maker. The other thing too with those eastern areas is they may be a bit more "unstable" with the heavier rain west. So they could get greater impact from that line as it moves east. Some decent signals the line could intensify as it progresses east.
  19. The Cape is going to get smoked. Wouldn't be surprised to see some 60-70 mph gusts there during the evening.
  20. The best winds will probably be from along 91 to Springfield and then north and east. Hi-res guidance is pretty impressive looking with the forced line, you could almost argue that should a line organize, it may not be that low topped. This would probably impact central Connecticut up to about Hartford and then points northeast and east from there. Remember...the line itself will not contain wind, it would be along the leading edge or just ahead of it. Big question though is with so much rain out ahead of it, will it be too stable to maximize gust potential?
  21. Time is flying. Pretty soon it will be spring training
  22. I'm hoping we get a severe thunderstorm watch tomorrow. Outside of northern New England it would be Severe Thunderstorm Watch: 1 Winter Storm Watch: 0 in meteorological winter hahaha
  23. It is quite unstable too...lots of convection embedded...even ahead of the fine line
  24. Haven't checked the 0z guidance but I thought we would see a 2% TOR area somewhere...likely northern NJ into SW CT but reading some of the posts that the 0z NAM was a bit east could explain for some of that reasoning.
×
×
  • Create New...