Jump to content

OceanStWx

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    19,758
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by OceanStWx

  1. Actually so much more of the job now is explaining to decision makers what the realistic goal posts are for an event like this. So you have to be willing to put it out there when the alarm bells are ringing. The secret is that the EM community understands what it means when you offer a 90th percentile forecast.
  2. Sprinkled on me out at the firepit on Sunday night, so I snuck a T in there.
  3. Central Park ripped off 1.96" in an hour. That's going to bring some Phil every time.
  4. That's the thing, if you can do kind of a Norlun-like setup with tropical rain you can really run up the totals.
  5. At this point I'm not sure Schill gets the benefit of doubt. Kind of like the Euro during the winter.
  6. Well 12z HREF really didn't back down, and in fact ramped up the threat I would say. Now seeing areas of 7-10 inches in 6 hours for the max product.
  7. Sorry, an 8 on the black lines not the shading. The black lines are an indication of what the highest ensemble members are showing. The shading shows roughly how many members are forecasting something bigger than the model climate. So big shading numbers make a soaker more likely, and the black lines as the numbers get bigger make a truly extreme event more likely.
  8. EPS EFI is pretty juiced. Good news is that the flooding in Greece was like an 8 on this index, so it is unlikely to be that bad. GEFS has a pretty good signal for >90th percentile mean QPF as well.
  9. As long as Dendrite gets the blame for my bad calls too.
  10. Closed low, good forcing, strong east component to mid level winds, lots of moisture.
  11. Pretty impressive to see a HREF mean of 3-4 inches in 24 hours. The max totals usually do a pretty good job of picking out the max reported amount (duh), but even falling a few inches short would be
  12. We average about 6 storm warnings (48 kt) per year, so I would say we have quite a few more chances to top that.
  13. You really could've punted when it was 1000 miles east of Puerto Rico. From that point forward the probabilities of a New England landfall based on storm position haven't really changed. To get probabilities much above 1 in 4, you really have to scrape HAT.
  14. Wouldn't shock me. It's kind of a waste of computer resources at this point.
  15. I think much of the effort is pouring in ensembles. Improving those and creating new tools for visualization. Increasingly I think deterministic models are becoming just another ensemble member which can ping around between the goal posts. NCEP is moving towards a paradigm with a 60 hour hi-res model and beyond that moving more towards the ensemble space.
×
×
  • Create New...