Roger Smith

You never know with Denver, they can run +4 for three weeks and then lose it all in two or three -25 anomaly days but PHX seems to run either blandly 2-4 above average or quite chilly the odd month, so far this has not been the odd month. This is the hardest I have ever hugged consensus in about ten years of these contests. It might prove to be a good idea.

Anomalies and some projections ... ________________________ DCA _ NYC _ BOS _ ORD _ ATL _ IAH _ DEN _ PHX _ SEA 11th __ (anom 10d) _____-1.8 _ -1.2 _ +0.5 __ -0.2 _ -1.9 _ -3.6 _ +5.1 _ +4.1 _ -0.3 21st __ (anom 20d) _____-1.1 _ -0.6 _ +1.4 __ -0.8 _ -0.6 _ -1.0 _ +5.0 _ +4.5 _ +0.5 11th __ (p anom 20d) ___-1.0 _ -0.8 __ 0.0 __ -2.0 _ -1.5 _ -1.5 _ +3.0 _ +4.5 _ -0.5 11th __ (p anom 27d) ___ -1.0 _ -1.0 __ 0.0 __ -1.5 _ -1.0 _ -1.0 _ +2.5 _ +4.0 _ -1.0 21st __ (p anom 30d) ___ -1.5 _ -1.0 _ +0.5 _ -1.5 _ -1.0 _ -1.0 _ +3.0 _ +4.0 __ 0.0 26th __ (p anom 30d) ___ -2.0 _ -1.5 __0.0 __ -2.0 _ -1.5 _ +0.5 _ +5.0 _ +5.0 _ 0.0 30th __ (final anoms) ___ -2.0 _ -1.8 __0.0 __-1.0 _ -1.3 _ -0.6 _ +6.9 _+5.0 _+1.4 ___________ 11th _ A rather cold start for parts of the eastern and central states, and also the Pac NW, but mild in the southwest ... after a few warmer days in the east, this pattern looks set to reload but with enough variability to keep anomalies quite close to zero. The longer term projection maintains the same trends since the output of the GFS for days 11-16 looks about the same. The size of the anomalies is scaled down in that more distant interval. 21st _ Some colder days ahead for most eastern and central locations, although with fairly mild intervals moderating the overall impact on current anomalies which are already slightly negative in most of those places. Continued fairly mild in the west. 26th _ Reset the end of month predictions for provisional scoring to begin. 30th _ Final data now posted. Just minor editing left to do on scoring files which will be complete soon, titles of scoring posts will indicate status.

Okay, for whatever reason the width on screen has more or less returned to normal and the tables are now much more legible as they generally don't wrap now. If somebody did something, thanks. Will continue to monitor in case it goes back to the narrower screen.

This would get the name Adria if they do name it, as you know, Greek letters were shown the door and now we have a supplementary list which has these names -- Adria, Braylen, Caridad, Deshawn, Emery and Foster. As it might be a hurricane right away, the count could be 22/8/4 if there is in fact a name given. (current count being 21/7/4).

Well the convention in other contests that I enter (and one that has been going for many years and that is not scored by me in one case) is to treat all similar forecasts as separate entities and in all probability BKViking (who is a regular in the temperature forecast contest) never noticed that he was making the same forecast as wxwatcher007, or else did notice and agreed that was the call to make. The convention in those other contests is to rank the identical forecasts from earliest to latest entry which I did not do here (yet). I see your point but just to let you know that this scoring convention is fairly well established in weather contests and not something I introduced here for the first time. (later edit _ I went and had a look, realized that in fact it would make no difference to anything if I went with this suggestion, so I have edited in the changed ranks and also removed some gaps in the table that served no actual purpose. ... so now it is ranked the way NC89 suggests.) Also by the way there was no actual reason for that gap in the scoring table, it wasn't on my screen but what I see and what gets posted sometimes not the same thing. I can probably just edit the table to show the ranks the way you suggest with an asterisk noting that two forecasts are at the same rank. But be prepared if you enter other contests in other places, that's how they normally handle identical forecasts. I suppose the cases I had in mind would deal with duplicate values on a regular basis, for example, one temperature value and fifty to a hundred entrants, you will always have clusters of multiple entrants at one value. And in my experience you finish ranked behind all of them if their errors are smaller. But what can you do when there are more entrants than plausible entry points? With this contest the complexity is greater so that 30 people could all choose unique forecasts. On the other hand, I don't think there is anything basically wrong with placing an identical forecast, if this is what you think is going to happen, it's your best effort and the fact that somebody else thought the same thing might not be any contributing factor. Some people in past years have repeated the NHC or CSU numbers, would we penalize that or simply view it as prudent forecasting, after all, whose numbers should be best, me at my desk here in the middle of nowhere, or some established expert(s) being paid millions to do this sort of work? (so why do some of us, well let's not go there) ....

Later guesses for the other three won't be eliminated until at least one other station goes in this window of opportunity, as most of those who scored well on IAD have similar dates for BWI and some also for RIC. My thought that it would resemble 1963 has suffered from a fast forward, we had the warm dry three weeks and the warm wet week all compressed into one month now Nov 2021 looking a bit too much like some colder analogues, wouldn't go with my present guesses now but could get lucky I suppose. There's a mountain of hot air from central DC, somebody should look into the reasons for that.

Could anyone in the know help me out with this problem? I posted a thread in the climate change section with extensive data tables (Toronto and NYC historical weather). The thread is basically a copy of something I posted on the UK weather forum "net-weather" which has a very similar graphic design to this forum. And my thread over there is fixed in width so that the tables do not wrap. Here, after a while the on-screen appearance of the thread got quite narrow compared to other threads that I either started or that I visit on American Weather Forum. It is basically about half as wide as it needs to be, so all the tables are now wrapped in appearance and that makes them almost unreadable or unusable. There is a link posted to net-weather so any determined reader could go there and see the tables in their proper format. Anyway, if there's something I can do (or undo) that would solve this problem, I would like to hear about that, or, if a moderator could get into the background of the program somewhere and force a width onto the thread, either of those might solve the problem. Alternatively if readers go there and find that they don't see the same problem, then it resolves the situation since I don't need to see the tables in their correct form to edit them. (I regularly add new information as it comes in). Thanks in advance.

Thanks for adding those snowfall totals. Some time this winter I will add in maximum weekly snowfalls for each date. Meanwhile, three new weekly rainfall totals have been set in 2021, weeks ending Oct 30, Oct 31 and Nov 1 all have slightly higher totals now than before. The records broken were from 1917 (30th) and 1943 (31st, 1st). The new records are 4.70" 4.71" and 4.48" ... there won't be any further records until the next time heavy rain falls, as today (Nov 2) we lose the 3.30" from Oct 26 which fell just short of being the seventh daily record broken in 2021 (1943 held on at 3.40").

Table of forecasts for November 2021 FORECASTER ___________ DCA _NYC _BOS __ ORD _ATL _IAH ___ DEN _PHX _SEA ____ bias Stormchaser Chuck ____ +2.0_ +2.0_ +1.8 ___ 0.0_ +2.0_ +1.0 ____ 0.0_ +0.5_ -1.5 ___ +0.73 Scotty Lightning ________ +1.5 _+1.0 _+1.0 __ +1.0 _+1.5 _ +1.5 ___ +0.5 _+1.0 _+0.5 ___ +1.09 so_whats_happening ____+1.3_ +1.5_ +1.6 __ +0.6_ -0.8_ +1.4 ___ +1.5_ +0.9 _ -1.0 ___ +0.67 BKViking ________________+0.2_ +0.4_ +0.5 __ -1.0_ +0.2_ +1.3 ___ +1.5_ +1.4_ +1.0 ___ +0.50 hudsonvalley21 _________ +0.1_ +0.6_ +0.6 __ +0.8_ +1.0_ +1.8 ___ +2.4_ +2.5_ -0.2 ___ +0.96 __ Normal ________________ 0.0 __ 0.0 __0.0 ___ 0.0 __0.0 __0.0 ____ 0.0 __ 0.0 __ 0.0 ___ -0.11 DonSutherland1 ________ -0.3_ -0.2 _ +0.2 __ +0.5 _-0.1 _ +0.2 ___ +1.2_ +1.0_ +0.2 ___ +0.19 Roger Smith ____________ -0.3 _ -0.4 _ +1.0 __ -1.5 _ -1.5 _ -1.2 ___ +2.4 _ +1.5 _ +0.8 ___ -0.02 __ Consensus ___________-0.3 _ -0.1 _ +0.5 __ -0.4 _ -1.0 _ +0.5 ___ +0.8 _ +1.0 _ 0.0 ___ Deformation Zone _______-1.0 __+0.5 __ 0.0 __ -1.0 _-1.0 __ 0.0 ___ +0.5_ +1.0 __ 0.0 ___-0.22 Tom _____________________ -1.1 _ -0.9 _ -0.8 ___ -1.1 _ -2.1 _ -1.8 ___ +0.1_ +0.9 _+0.5 ___ -0.81 wxallannj ________________ -1.2 _-1.2 _ -1.0 ____+1.0 _-1.5 _+0.5 ___ +0.7_ +1.9 _ -1.0 ___ -0.31 RodneyS ________________ -1.4_ -0.1 _ +0.5 ___ -0.4 _-1.6 _ -0.6 ___ +0.8 _+1.0_ +0.6 ___ -0.24 RJay ____________________ -1.5 _ -1.5 _ -1.5 ___ -1.0 _ -1.5 _+2.0 ___ +1.0 _ +1.5 _ 0.0 ___ -0.39 wxdude64 _______________-1.7_ -1.6 _ -1.2 ___ -1.8 _ -1.3 _ -0.9 ___ +0.4 _+2.2_ -0.6 ___ -0.86 _______________________________________________ Highest and lowest forecasts are color coded. Coldest for PHX (and DEN tied with SC) is Normal. Bias is the average departure of your forecasts from consensus (which are medians of all 13 forecasts excluding Normal).

The backup of posts is no longer needed and has been deleted now that the table of entries is complete. Good luck everyone and welcome to Stormchaser Chuck. I have posted scoring for October including an annual update; this will be adjusted tomorrow but the anomalies cannot change very much as they are based on all info now. See also notes at the bottom of the annual update about your status in the best forecast and extreme forecast tables. If S.C. wins any of those awards, it will be noted but then a second award will take place within the regular group of forecasters (which includes DZ who has four contests now -- if you're wondering why you can't see DZ in the thread, he submits by e-mail as this is his only participation in Am Wx at present.) Which reminds me, check my e-mail.

<<<< ============ - - - - Annual Scoring for 2021 (Jan-Oct) - - - - ============ >>>> High scores for nine locations shown in red, high scores for regions in bold. New feature _ change in rank is shown after forecaster name. No entry there means same position as last month. Consensus moved down one relative to forecasters (from being between 3rd-4th to the gap between 4th-5th). Normal moved down two positions (from 8th-9th to 10th-11th gaps in the forecaster rankings). Other changes shown for forecasters do not include forecasters moving past consensus or normal, or vice versa. FORECASTER _________________DCA_NYC_BOS__east_ ORD_ATL_IAH__cent __c/e ___DEN_PHX_SEA__west___TOTALS DonSutherland1 ______________ 707 _758 _502 _ 1967 __638 _788 _696 _2122_ 4089__466 _683 _670 _1819___ 5908 RodneyS (up 1) _______________ 653 _732 _515 _ 1900 __511 _756 _612 _ 1879__3779 __566 _694 _698 _ 1958___ 5737 BKViking (down 1) ____________ 685 _758 _515 _ 1958 __471 _733 _666 _ 1870__3828 __555 _631 _674 _ 1860___ 5688 Tom (up 1) ____________________ 718 _797 _561 _ 2076__447 _649 _684 _ 1780__3856 __542 _601 _658 _ 1801___ 5657 ___ Consensus (down 1) ______ 715 _762 _506 _ 1983 __474 _706 _652 _ 1832__3815 __546 _603 _668 _ 1817___ 5632 wxallannj (down 1) ___________ 643 _710 _469 _ 1822 __451 _670 _664 _ 1785__3607 __678 _569 _726 _ 1973___ 5580 hudsonvalley21 (up 1) ________692 _731 _522 _ 1945 __426 _718 _636 _ 1780__3725 __489 _608 _721 _ 1818___ 5543 RJay (up 4) __________________ 655 _707 _556 _ 1918 __532 _679 _617 _ 1828 __3746 __533 _511 _549 _ 1593___ 5339 so_whats_happening (up 1) __ 743 _715 _389 _ 1847 __482 _732 _563 _ 1777__3624 __470 _598 _627 _ 1695___ 5319 wxdude64 (down 3) __________674 _645 _475 _ 1794 __398 _685 _644 _ 1727__3521 __580 _585 _624 _ 1789___ 5310 Scotty Lightning (down 1) ____ 675 _700 _448 _ 1823 __361 _634 _608 _ 1603__3426 __550 _577 _676 _ 1803___ 5229 ___ Normal (down 2) __________652 _616 _344 _ 1612 __286 _690 _670 _ 1646 __3258 __530 _644 _678 _1852___ 5110 Roger Smith __________________619 _566 _288 _ 1473 __460 _592 _686 _ 1738 __3211 __502 _539 _656 _ 1697___ 4908 Deformation Zone _ (4/10) ___ 233 _ 218 _154 __ 605 __152 _286 _252 __690___ 1295 __226 _ 230 _ 264 __720___2015 (for comparison prorated)^^ __583 _ 545 _385 _1513 __380 _715 _630 _ 1725 __3238 __565 _ 575 _ 660 _1800 __ 5038 _ this may not be exact because scoring in the four months DZ has entered may have been higher or lower than avg. Best scores for the locations and regions FORECASTER _______________ DCA _ NYC _ BOS __ east __ ORD _ ATL _ IAH __ cent __ c/e ___ DEN _ PHX _ SEA __ west ___ Totals DonSutherland1 ______________ 2 ____ 0 ____ 0 _____ 2 ______4 ____ 1 ____ 1 ____ 4 ____ 4 _____ 0 ____ 3 ____ 1 _____ 0 _____ 1 __ Jan RodneyS _____________________ 2 ____ 2 ____ 2 _____ 1 ______ 1 ____ 2 ____ 0 ____ 2 ____ 1 _____ 0 ____ 2 ____ 0 _____ 2 _____ 2 __Feb,Jul BKViking _____________________ 1 ____ 1 ____ 1 _____ 1 ______ 0 ____ 0 ____ 3 ____ 0 ____ 0 _____ 0 ____ 1 ____ 2 _____ 0 _____ 1 __ Apr Tom __________________________ 2 ____ 2 ____ 1 _____ 2 ______ 0 ____ 0 ____ 1 ____ 0 ____ 1 _____ 0 ____ 0 ____ 2 _____ 1 _____ 1 __ May ___ Consensus _______________ 0 ____ 0 ____ 0 _____ 0 ______ 0 ____ 1 ____ 1 ____ 0 ____ 0 _____ 0 ____ 0 ____ 1 _____ 0 _____ 0 __ wxallannj _____________________ 0 ____ 2 ____ 1 _____ 0 ______ 1 ____ 1 ____ 2 ____ 1 ____ 0 _____ 4 ____ 1 ____ 1 _____ 3 _____ 0 __ hudsonvalley21 _______________ 0 ____ 0 ____0 _____ 1 ______ 0 ____ 0 ____ 0 ____ 0 ____0 _____ 0 ____ 0 ____ 3 _____ 1 _____ 0 __ RJay __________________________ 1 ____ 1 _____ 4 _____ 1 ______ 1 ____ 1 ____ 2 ____ 1 ____ 2 _____ 1 ____ 0 ____ 0 _____ 0 _____ 2 __Sep,Oct so_whats_happening _________ 3 ____ 1 ____ 1 _____ 1 ______ 1 ____ 2 ____ 0 ____ 1 ____ 1 _____ 0 ____ 0 ____ 0 _____ 0 _____ 1 __ Mar (t) wxdude64 ____________________ 1 ____ 1 ____ 0 _____ 1 ______ 0 ____ 0 ____ 0 ____ 0 ____0 _____ 2 ____ 1 ____ 0 _____ 2 _____ 1 __ Mar (t) Scotty Lightning ______________ 2 ____ 0 ____ 0 _____ 0 ______ 1 ____ 1 ____ 1 ____ 0 ____ 0 _____ 0 ____ 0 ____ 1 _____ 0 _____ 0 __ ___ Normal ____________________ 2 ____ 1 ____ 1 _____ 1 ______ 1 _____ 1 ____ 0 ____ 1 ____ 1 _____ 1 ____ 3 ____ 1 _____ 1 _____ 1 __May,Jul Roger Smith __________________ 1 ____ 0 ____ 1 _____ 1 ______ 2 ____ 2 ____ 3 ____ 2 ____ 1 _____ 2 ____ 1 ____ 2 _____ 1 _____ 2 __Jun, Aug Deformation Zone ____________ 0 ____ 0 ____ 1 _____ 0 ______0 ____ 0 ____ 1 ____ 0 ____ 0 _____ 1 ____ 1 ____ 0 _____0 _____ 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EXTREME FORECAST STANDINGS High score must go to either the extreme warm or cold forecast, or second most extreme, for a station to qualify. So far this year, 69 locations out of 90 have qualified, 4 in Jan, 5 in Feb, 7 in March, 6 in April, 8 in May, June and July, 7 in August, and 8 in September and October. Of those, 38 were awarded to warmest forecasts, 31 to coldest. A loss in the standings represents a case where second most extreme forecast had the high score and the win for that month. Normal can only win along with a forecaster. There have been eight shared wins (one by four and one by three) accounting for the excess of total wins (excl Normal). FORECASTER _______ Jan __ Feb __ Mar _ Apr _ May _ Jun _ Jul _ Aug _ Sep _ Oct ___ TOTAL to date Roger Smith _________ 2-1 __ 2-0 __ --- __ 1-0 __ 1-0 __ 2-0 __ --- _ 3-1 _ 3-0 _ 0-1 __ 14-3 RodneyS ____________ ---- __ --- __ ---- __ --- __ 2-1 __ 1-0 __ 6-0 _ --- _ 1-0 _ 1-0 __ 11-1 wxallannj ____________ ---- __ --- __ --- __ 3-0 __ 2-0 __ 3-0 __ --- _ 1-0 _ --- _ 1-0 __ 10-0 DonSutherland1 _____ 2-0 __ 1-0 __ 2-0 __ 0-1 __ 2-0 __ 1-0 __ --- _ --- _ 1-0 _ 1-0 __ 10-1 ___ Normal ___________--- __ --- __ 2-0 __ ---- __ 1-0 __ --- __ 5-0 _ 1-0 _ --- _ 0-0 __ 9-0 RJay _________________ --- __ --- __ 2-0 __ 2-0 __ 1-0 __ 1-0 __ --- _ 1-0 _ 1-0 _ 1-0*__ 9-0 so_whats_happening _--- __ 1-0 __ 2-0 __ --- __ --- __ 1-0 __ ---- _ --- _ 3-0 _ --- __ 7-0 Tom __________________---- __ --- __ --- __ --- __ 1-0 __ 1-0 __ ---- _ --- _ --- _ 3-0 __ 5-0 wxdude64 ___________ --- __ 1-0 __ 2-0 __ --- __ --- __ --- __ ---- _ 1-0 _ --- _ --- __ 4-0 Deformation Zone ___ ---- __ --- __ --- __ --- __ --- __ ---- __ 1-0 _ 1-0 _ 1-0 _ 1-1 __ 4-1 BKViking _____________ ---- __ --- __ --- __ --- __ 1-0 __ 1-0 __ 0-1 _ --- _ 1-0 _ --- __ 3-1 Scotty Lightning _____ ---- __ --- __ ---- __ --- __ --- __ 1-1 __ 1-0 _ --- _ 1-0 _ --- __ 3-1 __________________________________ * RJay also had two other near-win efforts in October tied or very close to tied with others but late penalty interfered. These are called "no decision" outings in this contest. ** Note that for best forecast and extreme forecast awards, players in these current tables will be eligible after any first time forecasters are evaluated in November (seeing as one at least has entered -- meaning that if one of those new entrants wins then the field will be re-evaluated without that score involved).

--0.3 __ --0.4 __ +1.0 __ --1.5 __ --1.5 __ --1.2 ____ +2.4 _ +1.5 _ +0.8

Now that the New England storm has become STS Wanda, we are at 21/7/4. Later today I will edit changes into previous posts about scoring, removing now-excluded possible outcomes. Wanda could become a hurricane (not the current NHC prediction) but seems unlikely to be a major hurricane so that 21/7/4 and 21/8/4 scoring will remain as well as options for 22/7/4, 22/8/4 and 22/8/5 and 22/9/4, 22/9/5 -- previous scoring tables are now updated.

Imagine the fun you could have in these contests if you could control the weather or travel in time to find out the results. Like olafminesaw.

The biggest snowstorm in recent years happened after the warmest December, so the argument that the current warming climate will cap this potential is inherently weak. The distribution of extreme precip events tends to swing wider from the median than temperatures which rarely do what I experienced here this summer, a 5 degree increase on long-term extremes. It is not so surprising when a new rainfall record for a given location is twice the value of the old one it replaces. Subjectively, I don't imagine that snowstorms from 2010 and 2016 will be beaten in this coming decade but would you bet against them being edged out within a century? So I think maybe the answer to this question is around 40" and possibly more. A very high snowfall total for one storm in your region would definitely require a stalled low tucked into the coast in a suitably cold regime. This rarely happens but there is no theoretical reason why it couldn't happen. If there was a natural variability change to colder climates, which probably will happen at some point in the next century or two, then the odds of such an event would improve. So I would hazard the guess that if anyone retrieves this thread in the year 2100 and checks it out, they will be talking about the 35 to 40 inch snowstorm of 2063 or some such thing, and wondering did we hoary ancients foresee such a thing? I just did.

I am not quite as pessimistic as some ... BWI: 23.5" DCA: 18.2" IAD: 26.6" RIC: 14.8" Tiebreaker (SBY or LYH): LYH 18.9"

I would not give up hope for this winter. For one thing, warm Octobers have often been followed by productive winters in the northeast so that can't hurt the chances for the Mid-Atlantic. Don't know how your region did with the epic Dec 26th 1947 (NYC region) storm but that followed the warmest October on record. Octobers of 1963 and 1971 were high on the list also, and had at least reasonable winters with spells of mild and cold and one decent snowfall event (again this is for the northeast, I don't have your historical records at hand). And on the other hand cold Octobers have often been followed by unproductive winters. This of course is only analogue forecasting without reference to teleconnections or other more sophisticated indices. Some of the years that have looked rather similar to 2021 (albeit in cooler climate decades) include 1898 which had a famously cold and snowy winter following on. 1916 had a cold winter (1916-17), not sure as to snowfall with that. Also would point out that recent storms are showing tendencies to do things that we can say would be good for snow potential if they did similar things in the heart of the winter season. Overall I am going to make a fairly moderate prediction (in the snowfall contest) but I do think there is potential for this to turn out better than some are fearing. Totals around 15-25 inches may be attainable. It won't likely be a top ten sort of winter but there may be one memorable cold spell and snowstorm associated.

Tie breaker now 3.01" ... congrats peribonca, George BM, toolsheds.

The NHC continue to suggest that this storm now northeast of Bermuda heading southeast may become Subtropical Storm Wanda in a few days. So for a name it could be Wanda in the Womb, or maybe Backwards Bob. Perhaps re-analysis will establish that it was already TS Wanda in its earlier rampage, and as somebody mentioned, it was very close to cat-1 hurricane intensity over the Cape. The perfect storm of 1991 is now referenced as an "un-named hurricane."

83 mph gusts in that list for Wellfleet, near the band (and 2h ago now), also since I checked, 88 mph Vineyard Haven.

Radar showing some rather extreme looking thunderstorms approaching Cape Cod from ENE. Perhaps wxw007 can let us know what happens there although the echoes are somewhat north of where I think his position is. Had a look at peak wind gusts reported, 87 mph Scituate was the highest I noted, several others in low 80s. (mph)

The low center will apparently pass between the Nantucket buoy and the island because at the buoy, winds are backing from north to northwest as it approaches. At the harbor, steady NNE. Would look for the low to be a few miles south of ACK by 04-05z. Winds will continue to increase until at least then.

Estimate 978 mb and position around 41N 68W approx 100 nm east of ACK. Will pass over or very close to buoy 44008 in about 3-4 hours. Currently about 985 mb there and strong NNE wind steady in the 30-50 knot range. The buoy that it was near a few hours ago has only slowly rising pressure telling us that the center is deepening as it pulls away to the west of that location. Unfortunately no other buoys much closer than these two.

Today's rainfall at NYC would already be a record for the 27th or 28th but has to get past 3.40" by midnight to beat 1943 for today's crown. If it does that, I believe that will be seven daily records for the year. 1983 had nine and 1913 had eight. The record for the 27th is much lower, only 1.88" from 2003. I suppose it's possible both records could go and then the year would be in that second place tie with 1913.

A recent check of reports from buoy 44011 (Georges Bank) and satellite animation suggests that retrograde center has formed around 40 nm southwest of that location or around 40.8 N 67.5 W and until last few obs the winds were gusting to 65-70 mph at that buoy, slight decrease past half hour and pressure check-rise probably means that strongest winds are now heading west. From both GFS and RGEM the track of this feature looks to be just to the south of ACK around 04-06z. Strongest winds to coast probably 03-05z, my guess peak winds at BOS around 65 mph, land areas of s.e. MA 75-80 mph. Will gradually back off to 45-55 and stay in that range for most of the overnight. U probly knew that but just putting it up as a thought.