Jump to content

Terpeast

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,367
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Terpeast

  1. Bring it on, what's good for W Loudoun is also good for me even though I'm just a stone's throw across the eastern side of 15
  2. "Up to 2 inches" WWA for eastern loudoun. Reasonable call
  3. Yeah, maybe we should've listened to Chuck. If you can get past the Chuck-speak and really understand what he's saying, you'll see his uncanny ability to make calls that seemed farfetched and then come true later. And we did get a beast -NAO block in January... it was surprising how quickly it fell apart.
  4. Agreed. Even 2-3" would be a steal considering how this system was depicted in the weeks leading up to now
  5. Wouldn’t be surprised to see a WWA in the next tier of counties south of the current WSW
  6. 12z euro shows more snow for the metros than 0z/6z, though that’s not saying much. Just 1” verbatim for mby
  7. Looks good. Reasonable. I love how the GFS has 10"+ across the river from me, with me getting almost nothing. This thing is gonna come down to rates.
  8. They went pretty low. Curious as to what's their high end call is
  9. Agreed. I think the 12k tends to overestimate snowfall and accumulations in marginal situations. I would think that the higher resolution 3k would capture the lower BL and microclimates better, and if the lower BL is a degree too warm then the 12k can easily miss that. The 3km HRRR on the other hand...
  10. I think in this case it comes down to the upper level low track
  11. 3k nam holds onto rain as the ptype for the metros, while 12k is much snowier. It’s going to come down to rates.
  12. H5 vort track and strength look similar to me on both. Different qpf maps sure
  13. CAMs were the first to catch on for both Jan events. Can they score a hat trick here?
  14. Interesting how the globals and cams are so far apart on snowfall amounts in this sub less than 24 hours before the event
×
×
  • Create New...