Jump to content

Winterweatherlover

Members
  • Posts

    1,109
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Winterweatherlover

  1. IMO have to post both the upside and downside extremes to give people a real sense of what can be expected, otherwise it creates a lot of bias when people only post the models at one end of the extreme.
  2. I;m going to post both high and low end images so people can see sort of the range iof options. CMC https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=gdps&p=snku_acc-imp&rh=2023031312&fh=66&r=us_ne&dpdt=&mc= GFS https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=gfs&p=snku_acc-imp&rh=2023031312&fh=66&r=us_ne&dpdt=&mc=
  3. Maybe but I lean the gfs is wrong and that sharp cutoff will be along or near I84. I'd be surprised if anyone in Westchester or Rockland is over 6 inches (maybe Rockland near the Bear Mountain region has a chance).
  4. I think NW NJ too far SW to get into the really good stuff but if you have elevation you may do ok.
  5. Of course the inverted trough actually happens when it hurts no snow chances but never happens when it’s cold enough to snow.
  6. Seems if there is a changeover in NYC it’ll be around 7 am. Really getting the absolute worse timing with this. The RGEM/CMC never change nyc over at all, all rain but they may be too extreme.
  7. I’m sure you’ll get more than cpk from this.
  8. Fair point. The cmc looks lousy too but I guess it’s expected cmc/RGEM would be similar. Guess we’ll find out tomorrow. Should be a sharp cutoff somewhere near I84 but not sure exactly where that sets up.
  9. There’s something that really triggers me about last second trends even if it doesn’t really affect imby. It makes it feel like we can’t trust anything.
  10. At least the majority of the subforum can now be on the same page again hating this storm and winter, what a disaster.
  11. RGEM looks bad for Boston too, seems same places that got hit all winter hit again. Everywhere else shafted.
  12. Agree I’d be going ballistic right now if I lived in the I84 corridor. Here I never had expectations.
  13. Looks pretty horrible even for lower elevations In Orange, Ulster, Putnam, and Dutchess. Pretty terrible bust if it verifies as I think NWS calling for 6+ in those areas.
  14. I’m not unless it shows something real inside 4 days.
  15. Since we are going football analogies Boston and HV got to the red zone but may not get a touchdown. We never got past the 50 yard line.
  16. It coulda worked out if everything went perfect but when you need perfection most likely it doesn’t happen.
  17. Terrible models. RGEM never had interest and that’s why I never felt good about this. I mean Euro isn’t terrible but I don’t think it’s number 1 anymore.
  18. Also the problem isn’t really the low going way east but it’s lack of cold air. I think most models still showing at least an inch qpf in this area.
  19. Agree not the same at all. This was always more of we need positive changes then we are in good shape storm.
  20. The HV is sorta getting maybe a last minute shaft they looked good for a while with this. NYC never looked good.
  21. Seems the lower elevations of the HV may bust badly as well. Story of the winter. You either need elevation or to be Albany and north this winter.
  22. Swing and a miss twice in a week, March sure kept with the theme since December.
  23. Imo no way the coast and NYC is 2-4 inches. I think through 7 am Tuesday it’s rain and then probably white rain Tuesday or maybe a mix. I’m not seeing anything to believe temps would be near freezing in or near the city.
×
×
  • Create New...