TheClimateChanger

Agreed. Looks very reasonable.

Looks like 6th least among complete seasons, officially. YMMV. 1879-1880 only includes snowfall records from January onwards. Also, the least snowiest on record at Pittsburgh International Airport, and least snowiest overall in the threaded record since the winter of 1932-1933 (when official observations were still taken downtown). That period (1931-32 & 1932-33) is also the only analog for back-to-back futility like the last two winters.

Surprisingly, the low on April 25, 1960 was a relatively chilly 48F. DCA was 95/58 on the same date.

Monthly record at IAD is 93F, set on April 6, 2010, April 17, 2002 and April 25, 1960. Will likely come up short today, but it's within reach. Even if it falls short of the monthly record, still fairly rarefied air here. Last 90F+ in the month of April occurred in 2010. IAD has done exceptionally well with monthly records over the last 16 months. The 79F on January 26, 2024 shattered the previous monthly record of 75F from 1/29/1975. The 80F reading on February 23, 2023, tied the previous monthly record set on February 21, 2018. The 100F reading on September 6, 2023 set a monthly record, with the three preceding days each tying the prior monthly record of 99F.

Reached 80 again at Detroit. That's the fourth 80+ reading of the month. From a historical standpoint, nothing too crazy. But it is true that there have only been 8 years with more 80+ days in April over the last 152 years of record, so it is fairly uncommon to see that many readings in the 80s in the month of April. One thing I do find interesting is the incidence of 80+ days in April has changed markedly since the turn of this century. It used to be the case that the VAST majority of Aprils failed to attain 80F or better in Detroit. Indeed, through 2000, 83 of 127 years failed to reach 80F. By contrast, in the most recent 24 years, only 5 have failed to reach 80F at least once. As a percentage, that means 65.4% of the first 127 years failed to reach 80F in the month of April. In the most recent 24 years, only 20.8% have failed to reach 80F. Not sure if this trend is significant but is a marked change. Perhaps @michsnowfreakcould weigh in with his thoughts?

It was a warm day but the 95F readings look to be exaggerated. I just went through the Ohio weather review for May 1887, and the hottest on those dates in the entire state was 90.6F on the 2nd and 92.5F on the 3rd in Meigs County (far south). No other station was 90F or better on either date. The second hottest was also the closest to Pittsburgh, in Jefferson County at 89.0F and 88.0F. All of the other sites in eastern Ohio were mainly in the mid 80s. Given the data, a 90/91F might be believable in the urban area, but 95F seems like a warm biased reading.

Yeah, those sure seem bogus. Looks like the heat wave only hit Pittsburgh. It was a warm 2-3 days for early May, but no other location in the region with records that old was anywhere near as hot on those dates.

His goal is not to produce a reliable record. His goal is to show less warming, which is why he rejects any adjustment. The adjustments are there to eliminate KNOWN biases. Why would you instead use biased data? The argument is always made - why do all of the adjustments increase warming? Most biases produce spuriously warm temperatures! Admittedly, time of observation could go either way. But, in this case, many co-operative stations reset thermometers at 5 or 6 pm prior to the 1960s. This produces warming relative to a day based on a morning or midnight observation schedule. He's previously said this doesn't impact the temperature record - patently absurd! Most days it wouldn't change things, but you wind up double counting highs whenever a cold front passes. You also miss numerous 11:59 pm lows, which are actually quite common - even in the summer. I don't know how many times, I've woke up to a ridiculously warm low in the mid/upper 70s and said "wow, that would be a daily maximum if it holds." It NEVER holds - a cool front passes, or thundershowers pop up. Imagine one day, there's a high of 97F. At 5 pm, it's still 95F. A cool front passes and the next day, the afternoon high is 84F, but goes in the record books as 95F. That alone tacks on more than 1/3 of a degree to the monthly mean high temperature.

Second half of April has actually been among the driest of record thus far.

I suppose if a typical April is record-breaking heat?

At Detroit, I am now projecting the monthly mean temperature to clock in around 53.3F, which would be good for 5th warmest on the threaded list. It's unfortunate that City Airport (KDET) is not the official reporting station as it was in the middle of the 20th century. The mean there just through yesterday was already 53.2F. Would probably be looking at a new monthly record there. Also would have had a new record high minimum and mean today. Either way, good chance DET (with continuous records to 1934) establishes a new monthly high. Elsewhere around the lower lakes, much the same. Many areas should see a top five warmest April, with perhaps some widely scattered record-breaking readings.

Absolute scorcher out there today. At Cleveland, the low of 68F and the mean of 74.5F both set daily record highs. The low was just two degrees shy of the monthly high minimum reading of 70F, set on April 25, 2009. At Detroit, the low of 63F was one shy of the daily record high set way back in 1899. The mean of 71.5F also fell just shy of the record of 72.0F, also set in 1899. At Mansfield, Ohio, the low of 65F was just two shy of the daily record high of 67F set in 1974, which is also the monthly record high. The mean temperature of 73F was just 0.5F below the daily record high of 73.5F, set in 1974, and just 2.5F below the all-time monthly record high of 75.5F set on April 24, 1925. At Youngstown, Ohio, the low of 66F set a new daily record high and tied the monthly record high minimum reading, set on April 17, 2002 & April 25, 2009. The mean temperature of 73.5F was just 0.5F shy of the daily record set in 1990, and just 2.5F below the all-time record high mean of 76F set on April 25, 2009. Tl;dr: About as hot as it gets in late April, and some of these locations will likely be even warmer tomorrow!

Mean temperature of 73.5F today (high of 83F, low of 64F). You’d think it would be a record, but it fell one short of the 74.5F observed on this date in 1990.

You know we’ll still have people complaining it’s too warm even when it’s one of the coldest spots in the entire metro area.

If the forecast for the rest of the month is correct, we will finish with a mean temperature for the month of about 56.2F, which would be good for 7th warmest of record. Since 1955, only 2017 (57.3F) saw a warmer April. Also still a good chance at the #1 wettest April on record.

Actually has a lot to do with it. I was pointing out that there have been entire Aprils where the mean minimum temperature was near or below freezing in Detroit. April 1874, of course, was particularly noteworthy, as it was case where the average low for the entire month was only a fraction of a degree warmer than the minimum this morning. An occasional freezing morning is to be expected more often than not.

Nothing too unusual for southeast lower Michigan. In 1874, the average low for the entire month at Detroit was 28.7F. And there have been 5 years in which the average low for the month of April was below freezing. That's why they say hold off on planting until Memorial Day.

I think the increase in frosts/freeze is just one of perception. If you look at NWS Pittsburgh, for an example, you can see freeze warnings used to be very rare in the spring prior to 2012. And it wasn't because it was warmer at that time. To the contrary, it was because they were not issued until May 1 in the south and May 15 in the mountains and north, because that's when the growing season used to begin. Now the growing season begins in April (or even March, as in 2012) and voila! --- Suddenly there's numerous freeze warnings each and every spring. It is true that 2020 had a lot of freeze warnings in May, but a good chunk of those were relegated to the mountains and north country and would not have been issued pre-2012. If you look at the actual data, you will see in the 19th century and early 20th century, it was common for low temperatures for the ENTIRE month of April to average below freezing in many of these areas, which means the majority of nights dropped below freezing in those months. Now in the same areas, there's a big hullabaloo with the rogue night dropping to 30F in mid to late April.

Lows have warmed dramatically at New York. No doubt freezes used to be much more common in the past. In the past, it was much colder. As low as 12 degrees in April 1923. Many years had average minima less than the coldest minimum temperature readings in recent years.

We are living in the climate statistics equivalent of baseball's steroid era. Like 40 home runs used to be a pretty big deal, then you suddenly enter an era where someone like Brady Anderson goes from averaging 20-25 homers to knocking 50 out of the park. And three different players are routinely hitting 60-70 a season.

I would probably compare only to years before 2000 and toss all the recent years. So many months now don't even crack the top 10 warmest, that would have been like 4th or 5th warmest on record just 20 years ago. That means the same months that would have been highlighted on the NWS website as being incredibly warm just a couple decades ago now don't even get a second glance and, in fact, people think those months are relatively mild because they compare it to the fact that, for instance, 5 of the most recent 12 years have been warmer. And it's those recent 12 years that people remember and base their expectations on. This happens all the time now. So many months look like no big deals, when they would have been considered very warm just a couple decades ago.

So, to me, this data would suggest that a place like Cleveland or Toledo has a climate like that of mid- to late 20th century northern and central Kentucky, over the past 10 years. Suburban Pittsburgh looks on par with suburban Washington, D.C. or Charleston, WV, while the city itself is more on par with southwest Virginia or far northeast Tennesee [lower elevation locales, not looking at mountain climates]. In light of the ongoing trend (even an apparent acceleration), I would anticipate Cleveland/Toledo will look like southern Kentucky by 2040, and suburban Pittsburgh will look like northeast Tennessee, while the city itself has a climate more on par with 20th century middle North Carolina.

Pittsburgh (May 2015 - April 2024) KPIT: KAGC: What's interesting is the city station used to run 2.6F warmer than KPIT and about 2.0F warmer than AGC owing to the much lower elevation and heat island effect, which, in either case, would imply the downtown city temperature over this interval is now around 56.0F. Sterling, VA (suburban Washington metro) [1962-1985] Roanoke, VA (1956-1985) Tri-Cities, TN (1956-1985)

Cleveland (May 2015 - April 2024) KCLE: KBKL [Burke Lakefront Airport]: Covington, KY (1956-1985) Lexington, KY (1956-1985)

This might be an unusual post, but does it seem like there is a perception problem when it comes to climate? Like people just accept the change, and then suddenly use that as the benchmark for what's a normal climate for a region. Like I feel that people think of Cleveland as this cold and snowy place, but the actual data would show over the last 10 years that the mean monthly and annual temperatures are on par with late 20th century northern/central Kentucky. Or Pittsburgh, where the mean annual and monthly temperature closely matches that of suburban Washington, D.C. metro or southern West Virginia, but inside the city, probably more on par with the lower elevations of eastern Tennessee or northwest Virginia.