Jump to content

George001

Members
  • Posts

    6,606
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by George001

  1. Stronger low on the nam at hour 27, 997mb vs 1000mb last run
  2. I don’t buy the dual low thing but we will see. The difference between your forecast and mine is just 1 or 2 degrees, that’s it. Tough forecast.
  3. I would go 10-15 in the 1-3 area (except the cape, there would be a sharp cutoff there due to low location), 16-24 in the 4-8 area, and 24-30 in the berkshires.
  4. Nam gets below freezing in interior areas and down to 33 for the coast, wouldn’t those areas below freezing see better than 10:1 ratios?
  5. The crazy thing is models could be underestimating the QPF by quite a bit despite giving many areas 2.5+ inches. With a 970s mb low stalling over the cape I think that will increase.
  6. The tv mets were forecasting 1-3 inches of snow for my area this evening
  7. Doesn’t look very east to me, the low is NW of the benchmark by a decent amount.
  8. Euro Canadian Ukie Navy Rgem and Nam all take the low over the cape
  9. Fuck it, I’m going to say it. That’s a monster blizzard!
  10. could the dual low thing be the models struggling with the transfer (Miller B redevelopment)? I think the models might consolidate and merge the 2 lows into one big low as we get closer to the storm.
  11. Yeah, this storm has a lot of potential. The airmass is bad but the low is deepening a lot so it can create its own cold air. Ultimately it comes down to low location.
  12. Looks like a similar snow distribution to last years blizzard. I hope it’s right
  13. I’m excited but I feel you on that. In the past I would have been hyping up a historic blizzard even the coast, but I’m skeptical of that this time.
  14. Yep major changes on the nam. Both northern and southern energy look stronger. I don’t know where the low will go but I think the strength of the low will increase.
  15. nam looks a bit more progressive with the northern energy could be a nod to the gfs here
×
×
  • Create New...