Jump to content

George001

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,949

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by George001

  1. George001
    Fuck it, I’m going to say it. That’s a monster blizzard!
  2. George001
    Great start to the 0z suite
  3. George001
    Yep, stronger low. 976mb over the elbow.
  4. George001
    could the dual low thing be the models struggling with the transfer (Miller B redevelopment)? I think the models might consolidate and merge the 2 lows into one big low as we get closer to the storm.
  5. George001
    Yeah, this storm has a lot of potential. The airmass is bad but the low is deepening a lot so it can create its own cold air. Ultimately it comes down to low location.
  6. George001
    Yeah unfortunately it doesn’t really have much support
  7. George001
    Looks like a similar snow distribution to last years blizzard. I hope it’s right
  8. George001
    Great change, east and stronger
  9. George001
    Low is already 4mb stronger at the surface this hour
  10. George001
    I’m excited but I feel you on that. In the past I would have been hyping up a historic blizzard even the coast, but I’m skeptical of that this time.
  11. George001
    Yep major changes on the nam. Both northern and southern energy look stronger. I don’t know where the low will go but I think the strength of the low will increase.
  12. George001
    I like that 964mb low just off the outer cape
  13. George001
    nam looks a bit more progressive with the northern energy could be a nod to the gfs here
  14. George001
    Wow, thats way better than 12z. low over the islands instead of plowing inland.
  15. George001
    They could be wrong, it wouldn’t be the first time nor will it be the last. The stations I watched emphasized the high degree of uncertainty here, yes they are leaning towards a rainy solution but that could change depending on what the future guidance says.
  16. George001
    Uncle?
  17. George001
    Big Euro run tonight, don’t want to see that low running inland again.
  18. George001
    If it’s right about the low location and strength that’s a blizzard for eastern mass too (big if, I know).
  19. George001
    HOLY SHIT THE CANADIAN HAS A 968MB LOW OFFSHORE
  20. George001
    Low moved east of last run but I’d like to see it get stronger like last nights euro. I do think it is underestimating the strength of the low though, it doesn’t pick up on the dynamics as well as the Euro does and the mesoscale models (once they are in range). Ultimately I think it will come down to low location.
  21. George001
    I wish the nam went farther out, extrapolated it looked like that was going to be a really good solution
  22. George001
    Despite a really tucked low it’s colder than the other guidance. Snow east of the low?
  23. George001
    For me part of it is I find it really fascinating how unpredictable the weather is. Also enjoy the aesthetic of it, whether it’s watching the snow pile up during a monster blizzard, severe thunderstorms, heavy rain, hurricanes, extreme heat, etc, it’s just really cool.
  24. George001
    Not everyone enjoys the same type of weather. Most on this board like cold and snow, you like warmer weather, and some of us even like both. Yeah, it’s not really logical but who cares?
  25. George001
    Where’s the Pope? We need his guidance on where the low will be.
×
×
  • Create New...