MN Transplant

We get a nice NW flow when the hurricane curves off to sea.

Not so fast. With the 100 at IAD too, i think@RickinBaltimore took the lead.

BWI got 100

Highs as of the 2pm ob: DCA: 94 IAD: 97 BWI: 97

It seems like you’ve just lost contact with the outside unit. I think for some of these the barometer is in the display until. What is your power source outside?

IAD and my station are running slightly ahead of yesterday. BWI about even and DCA a touch behind.

Yup, it doesn’t take long unfortunately. Measurable rain once here in 2.5 weeks.

All records, of course.

Sets us up for tomorrow with the slightly higher 850s.

DCA joins the 98+ cohort

Screams dry downslope. Amazing.

Might be a fake 5-min 99 unless the NWS has confirmed it. The official ob was 98. IAD at least 98. DCA at least 96. 94.8 is the high at home.

The 5-minute ob reminder. There will never be a 98 degree 5-min ob (only the hourly obs at 52 or 53 past) because of the silly rounding that is done, but any 100 is legit.

It is all about finding lifeguards.

Since you and I have DCA/IAD identical, I really just need BWI to hit 100 and not RIC. Of course, we are both going to lose when IAD/DCA hit 100 tomorrow.

Our pool was hopping too, but they are open for two more weekends (and 4-8pm during the week).

DCA is running well ahead of yesterday while IAD is a touch ahead. The clouds hung around yesterday so the comparisons are a bit tough to make. My station is actually a degree behind.

March 1907 is amazing. There are 4 record highs that still stand including the hottest March temp (93).

98 at DCA. Believe that is the new high for the year.

Topped my high from yesterday. 94.5 and gross.

A lot of the entries are still in play. Stupid BWI pavement stopped working.

I was tracking IAD for a while earlier today but fell off the pace. Only 94.

93.4 is the high so far here.

These differences are just wild for Monday afternoon. The NAM seems way too humid at the low levels, but the GFS mixing depth is, uh, let's go with aggressive.

Yeah. This is a brutal image. The +2 period is basically ending in 2040, +3 in 2060, and +4 in 2080. Projected changes to mean annual snowfall (%) at Toronto, Ontario (a); Montréal, Québec (b); Halifax, Nova Scotia (c); Boston, Massachusetts (d); New York City, New York (e); and Washington, D.C. (f) for the three global warming levels. Relative changes with respect to the 1980–2009 mean are plotted for each CRCM5 simulation (symbols indicated in the legend). A kernel density estimation of the distribution of projected changes among the CRCM5-ClimEx simulations is shaded in the gray violin plots generated using the Seaborn package (Waskom, 2021). Within each violin plot, a smaller box plot is included indicating the median (white dot), 25th–75th percentile (dark gray box) and complete range of the CRCM5-ClimEx data (dark gray vertical lines). Values calculated from the pooled data for all 50 ClimEx members are indicated by the purple circles. Signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) calculated from the ClimEx data is indicated under each violin plot.