Jump to content

ORH_wxman

Moderator Meteorologist
  • Posts

    91,398
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ORH_wxman

  1. Euro didn’t trend better at 12z. Mostly far SE areas and Cape hit. It has maybe a general 1-2” near and south of pike though.
  2. A lot better. Looks almost like Ukie. Maybe not quite as juicy but pretty close.
  3. I see we have already erased 2020 from your memory.
  4. Mostly a south coast and cape scraper on GFS but another bump would make it pretty decent if we can get that trend going rather than just oscillating between scrapers and whiffs on this model.
  5. Don’t think it will be enough on GFS but def a good trend.
  6. Rgem def improved. Need a little more for up here but that was a nice hit for SE areas/Cape.
  7. I think it’s def going to be a struggle to amplify this. There’s enough room to get us with a decent event but not by much. You really want to see those TPV heights relax a little north of us which allows the shortwave/vort energy to swing around the base a little easier…but it’s not an easy task.
  8. Maybe…hard to really put any stock in the NAM at this range but it’s been kind of close to the Euro. Would be nice to get the GFS trending NW
  9. Only goes out to 60h, but the 3k NAM might be a bit more amped than the 12km NAM. Hopefully other guidance follows suit.
  10. Nice look for SE areas. Even most of E MA gets in on the developing commahead briefly.
  11. Looks like 12z NAM is a little better than 06z through 54 hours. Not quite as suppressed.
  12. There’s obviously plenty of ways to get a torching cutter too but this H5 look is very CAD-ish up in New England.
  13. On which model? There’s like 10 different variations of what I’ve seen for that period.
  14. 06z euro improved again after the regression at 00z. I don’t think this one has a high ceiling though. There’s just not enough room. But it could be a solid advisory event maybe.
  15. Classic west slope VT storm. That west and southwest flow does great there.
  16. Yeah most of SNE is prob advisory that run outside of far NW areas maybe….then you maybe get into low end warning in SE areas. Way too early to worry about amounts though. We can’t even get guidance to agree on if a system will even hit us.
  17. I think if you drop that another 50-100 miles west/southwest then you’re starting to give this enough room to tilt shortwave negative. That’s where you’d get this from a general 3-6/4-8 type event into double digits where a true CCB circulation can start rapidly developing. But at this point, I’m still leery of the whiff east. I don’t like how progressive the flow starts looking behind it so that’s always a worry. But if we can get guidance to trend solidly at 00z, then I’d start thinking a bigger solution isn’t merely a fantasy.
  18. Yeah…the low just escapes east before the real fun, but something to watch. Still a lot of good fronto on that run so SE areas would still prob get low end warning snows or close to it on 18z euro.
  19. Yeah if you dig those heights on the southwest side, it will help that TPV lobe to drop into the void and pump up downstream heights to get the moisture transport northwest over land.
  20. Far SE areas look like they try to catch the developing CCB. That would prob be some violence on the Cape…esp if it can pop quickly as that vort catches up to sfc.
  21. They are like one congealed mass of elongated TPV on the GFS/Icon…but esp the GFS. They stay much more independent on euro/canadian and NAM (if we care about clown range NAM)
  22. At least we have the old EE rule in effect.
×
×
  • Create New...