Jump to content

CheeselandSkies

Members
  • Posts

    2,961
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CheeselandSkies

  1. 9 hours ago, Geoboy645 said:

    Didn't Madison verify at least once last year? It's weird, I'm only 30 miles NE and I have verified warnings like 3 times since the beginning of last year.

    Possibly, but it seems all the expected big dogs last winter (including the one at the end of April, lol) verified on the low end of expected totals.

    • Like 1
  2. 18 hours ago, mempho said:

    Since 1950 the State of TN has only had 6 EF 3+ tornadoes and 2 EF4+ tornadoes.

    This- while not impossible - double digit snowfalls would be a more common occurrence.

    That doesn't mean that we won't see such an event but I wouldn't bet the house on it either.

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
     

    That can't be right. There were at least that many F4+ in the state on April 16, 1998 alone, plus several E/F3+ on days like Veteran's Day 2002, May 4, 2003, Super Tuesday 2008, and April 27, 2011.

  3. 2 hours ago, SchaumburgStormer said:

    The backside better be rocking or everyone is going to embarrassingly bust.
     

    (Poor WI crew, from a 20” big dog to advisory levels in a couple models runs hours before onset) 

    WSW downgraded to WWA for Dane. This system has confirmed for me that models are pointless. I quit.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  4. 4 minutes ago, janetjanet998 said:

    Yes but storm mode is still "grungy" as it has been most of the day

    once it starts that way it's hard to snap out of it..many outbreaks I have followed underachieved  because of it

     

     

    80kt  kt LLJ later may have a surprise or two

     

    That's about what I expected for today based on some of the issues I saw in forecast soundings. Storms have been intermittently severe with a few confirmed tornadoes, none particularly long-lasting or violent-potential-appearing (in contrast, to, say the 62-mile track beast of December 16th).

    Not that warnings shouldn't be taken seriously, especially at night.

  5. 3 hours ago, Drz1111 said:

    This strikes me as a warm-season plains chaser mindset, when this is a cool season Gulf Coast / Dixie Alley setup.  "Widely visible tornadoes" isn't really relevant when storms are moving at warp speed and LCLs are scraping the ground.   

    Yeah...it kind of is. That's one of the reasons I geek out about severe weather setups (that I can't chase myself), the possibility of armchair chasing and seeing live streams of video like this.

    Not to say that it won't be dangerous or capable of producing significant severe weather, just that the likelihood of tornadoes capable of leveling a frame house is not particularly high with this event (not that there couldn't still be a few).

    Either way this has been and continues to be a fun system to track, both the severe aspect and the potential winter wx aspects for MBY this coming weekend.

  6. Major veer-backing above 850mb in a lot of those soundings. Wind profiles get somewhat more favorable Saturday over MS/AL compared to Friday over TX/LA, but this wind profile is probably about the best I've found and even it is fairly unidirectional. I would look for a QLCS capable of widespread damaging winds and a few embedded tornadoes, some possibly strong. However, I'm not sold on the potential for sustained free warm sector supercells capable of long-track, EF3+, widely visible tornadoes. Not to say this couldn't still overachieve in that regard a la 12/16.

    ecmwf_full_2020010900_066_33.25--88.5.png

  7. 15 minutes ago, Bob's Burgers said:

    The euro is the new hype machine lol

     

     

    euro stpmax.png

    Still quite a bit of VBV in this sounding.  Shear profiles are progged to improve somewhat through the day Saturday in southern parts of MS/AL and the Florida panhandle. I think that's where/when any long-track, EF3+ supercell tornadoes will be with this event if things stand as they are.

    • Like 1
  8. Friday afternoon over E. Texas, EHI ticked up again on the 12Z NAM but VBV is quite pronounced above 850mb in forecast soundings from the most unstable areas. That's not a look for sustained open warm sector tornadic supercells. There could be some pretty potent QLCS tornadoes though with the amount of turning below 850mb.

    nam_2020010812_060_31.09--96.23.png

×
×
  • Create New...