DownpourDave

if true that is good news

Levi saying that recon found 80 mph winds. Seems like the strengthening continues.

In regards to Subtropical cyclones, I wonder why this is Is it because it is assumed that it is a meteorological impossibility for there to be a subtropical storm that has at least 74 mph winds? Upon further research, it seems there was a subtropical storm that was not classified as a tropical storm that had wind speeds at 70 mph. So is it that far-fetched that you could have a "Subtropical hurricane"? Sorry about being off topic. I have just wondered about this for a while. @Windspeed

If you actually care, here is a peer-reviewed journal article backing up my claim https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2006GL027313

Definitely but would most likely have to be a pinhole eye. A system with a larger eye would be harder pressed to find the high wind speeds that Patricia produced.

Wouldn't it take a while. The heat capacity of water is high so just "a couple of days in the sun"I feel like would not really warm up the waters that much.

listen to the actual video Direct quote from Levi "the plane is measuring 85-90 mph maximum not really getting up to the 100 mph that was observed earlier".

Im pretty sure you would be annoyed as well if someone called you out for no reason. It seems like a normal human reaction.

@cheese007@brentrich are you guys dense or what? Recon data clearly shows pressure between 987-990mb. Are you saying that is not weaker than this morning because it is. Think before you post. It would serve you well. Also if you actually took the time to look at the data like I did, you would see that recon had higher SFMR data this morning compared to now. Also Levi confirmed in his video what I said so yeah just please think before you post.

My college driving up the #s in Ontario County yikes...

technically the same storm so ill put it here, looks the storm has reformed in the Eastern Pacific.

well being a met is my dream job. If I do decide to change it won't be because of one convo on here. I think you can understand that.

Well its hard to see what the job market is going to be like in 6 years.

not true for certain. My PhD met professor I'm p sure makes over 100k a year.

what happened. Did you eventually decide being a met was not for you?

What is the thickness of the 900 to 500 hPa layer at Davenport, Iowa?

so questions like this fake meteorology am rite

serious question. why would someone with a PhD be making posts like that on the daily.

@the ghost of leroy also grow the **** up . I never said to get rid of him. Think before you escalate something for no reason. All I said is his meteorologist take should be looked at based on the type of posts that he makes.

lol what do you do.

I wouldn't say that moron. I am currently studying atmospheric science in college.

bump

this aged well LMAO

Ill put this in banter but for what it is worth the HMON is a lot weaker at landfall (around 990mb) at 18z.

Can meteorologist tags be revoked. Asking for a friend