NeonPeon

No one is ever arsed to show it in detail. People who live around the bay can apply the normal modifier. So many banding signatures show what always happens, better stuff northeast and better stuff west. In a very big storm, it gets enough goods around anyway. Im very dubious on a foot or more here, but that's the official forecast.

Lol, look at the antibullseye. Accurate

If it was juno redux, I would welcome it. Even though we got a relative min as usual, it was impossible to know precisely what we got anyway, there was so much drifring. There were drifts over the fences and bare grass. I skiied to a friend's 2 miles away and brought Glenlivet with me. It was a simpler time.

It's civil partnership. Europeans don't get married. What is this, 1950…?

I think you are misunderstanding. Anyhow. Yes. Many of these depictions are a blizzard in a few coastal places. Some could be a blizzard with some coastal flooding.

You are describing a james-shaped hole here constituting about a hundred mentions of the wind and the word blizzard. Rip.

Gfs ticked west... The chief outlier at this point. Hopefully we can get that into some sort of consensus today, so that a 0-2 feet forecast isn't floating around in the ether for half of new England.

When has a ri screw hole ever been centered over the rocky mountains of RI. When we get the mesos, the hole will start to resolve and then you can pick the best solution from whoever shows the correct relative min for me.

How do you know it's not reasonable. It seems plausible.

196 pages and things are getting toxic. My prediction? Pain.

Ugh. Read it and weep.

Weenies have the fear.

Going from 14" verbatim to 1" has to be one of the biggest swings I've ever seen. Hilarious.

What's several hundred miles between friends?

This NAM is an almost poetic account of everything that could go perfectly wrong with something pretty good.

Ah, but how will you know those conditions are met without tracking?

The GFS still shows a freakish bomb. I am not sure the details (strange oscillation and lobed low) is that convincing.

I'm not spooked, there's a great storm brewing that seems increasingly likely to do well for all. Its sensible impacts here are almost certainly going to be less than everywhere else, due to climo. I've yet to see a nor'easter not favor other areas, and I've been here for more than a decade now. As to the cape being nervous? They know the deal, as do I, for any storm, unless they are unhinged. Mixing is often a threat that requires tracking till the last minute. They aren't going to turn on being nervous or not at 3 days out. They are nervous till the flakes fall, if they are weenies at all.

This is how you get an STD.

And you're immune to this how, exactly? You're someone on the interior joyfully hoping that the cape rains so that you get your snow. Tale as old as time. Well, not really, since the advent of publicly consumable computer modeling, anyway.

Ah. I was just teasing anyway. I thought he meant 1-3', which would be plausible at that amount of liquid with good cold and perhaps not too much wind aloft in the interior?

Me.

I'm not convinced I'll get a foot, but even the most ardent pessimists will hope for more than 1-3"

I think you may be slightly conservative.

We know where that snow hole would actually set up.