Jump to content

high risk

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    3,300
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by high risk

  1. It does, although as their discussion mentions, the wind profiles are much more supportive of tornadoes to our northeast. Personally, I would put a tornado box over NJ, DE, southeast PA, and a severe box over MD and VA, but I can see where those shapes don't really fit around the initial box over PA.
  2. It's worth watching, for sure. With the westerly flow aloft, even 190 or 200 degree winds (SSW) at the surface might be enough to make things interesting. Most of the guidance veers us to more fully southwest ahead of storm development, though, and surface wind speeds may not be particularly strong. If that's wrong, yes, a tornado or two would be possible. My guess now is that we'll have some supercell structures (and a tornado warning or two) with the favorable deep-layer shear but not enough low-level shear for tornadoes.
  3. It's very warm to our south, so a fast warmup could absolutely occur, but I'm worried. While the guidance is all over the place, most initiate storms along the lee trough or some other boundary this afternoon. That said, the models have most of the area getting into the 90s, so if the clouds from the PA activity retard heating, we could end up with limited / weaker storms. It's also worth noting that the RRFS really wants to clock us late evening with the line dropping south out of PA, even though most over guidance has it falling apart. Bottom line is that I'm cautiously optimistic for rainfall today, and the severe threat is real if we get some heating, but there is definitely a path to many of us getting nada.
  4. I fully agree that any storms tomorrow afternoon that form have real severe potential. I don't see smoke being a major factor in our area; HRRR shows most of the smoke (both at the surface and in the column) retreating to the northeast. It warms us up to 95! I think you're on the right track with the warm mid-level temps hurting us, and the mean flow somewhat perpendicular to the lee trough also argues for more scattered coverage.
  5. That's not true. Other than some air quality models, the RAP and HRRR are the only standard forecasting models that explicitly account for smoke.
  6. Early thought is that storms will fire Saturday afternoon along the lee trough in an environment with good shear and at least moderate instability. (The NAM is likely too moist in the low levels, so toss its extreme instability). Severe will definitely be a concern, and the high PW environment may support locally intense rainfall, but the fast storm movement should prevent major flooding concerns. The potential round 2 is highly dependent upon timing. Right now, consensus seems to favor arrival very late in the evening, which leads to significant weakening (and possibly falling completely apart) before arrival. The shear will be increasing further after dark, so severe would be possible, but the timing really needs to speed up to make that happen.
  7. I was in NYC. Really, really unpleasant, although the smoke nicely kept the temperatures down.
  8. I've been here 30 years, and late night MCS event surviving from the Midwest and hitting us good have been really rare as far as I can remember. I can think of lots of MCSs falling apart in the morning hours as they arrive in the early morning, but not many delivering the goods in the warm season. (I can think of several cold season events with intense dynamics, but those were more frontal bands than an MCS.) It's just so difficult, because you need elevated instability to compensate for the surface cooling, and we so rarely get the big lapse rates.
  9. One thing that makes it so difficult to even distribute summer rain here in the east is the inability to have nighttime MCC events. Over the Plains, you can easily put down 1-2" over a large area with one of those systems, but we so rarely get EMLs here that MCCs can't survive the trip east.
  10. Yeah, towers went up along the northward-moving boundary but failed. Something is hostile to development, as shown by the complete collapse of the storms moving south out of PA
  11. Maybe, but right now, I’m going to need some convincing that WPC was justified in issuing an MPD for our area
  12. Visually from Howard County, cells are trying to go up on that outflow boundary moving north out of DC
  13. And south and north too.
  14. Some signal in guidance for a few late night / early morning cells, with higher chances to the east.
  15. I think it's justified. Lapse rates and instability are modest, but shear is workable, and convection should be organized and timed well for our area. CAMs all look pretty good. Friday has some potential too.
  16. Not really sure where discussion of today's weather should go, but there is a clear consensus that today's rain/storm threat will primarily be an after dark show
  17. At a time when most storms are ramping down, the cell near Manassas exploded, seemingly aided by a cell merger. Major downburst signal.
  18. Initiation ahead of schedule in the local area. Expecting an MD from SPC soon.
  19. Yeah, the HRRR develops storms in that general vicinity. NAM Nest develops convection over northern VA
  20. They evolve differently, but the HRRR and NAM Nest both like the I-95 corridor in MD around or just after sunset.
  21. If today happens, it's going to be a late show.
×
×
  • Create New...