Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    74,224

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. 40/70 Benchmark
    96-97 was cool neutral FWIW.. How about 75-76, 89-90 and 2011-2012?
  2. 40/70 Benchmark
    Nah....met degree taken from the kids' play pen?
  3. 40/70 Benchmark
    It's not all about temps...it won't grow much due to limited sun this time if year.
  4. 40/70 Benchmark
    I just mowed and trimmed for final time on Saturday...will start raking when I return from Africa
  5. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yawn
  6. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yea, you just add a degree to the composite, but disregarding a potentially good analog due to GW is silly.
  7. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yea, maybe winter ends up mild, but the CFS will be wrong on ENSO....I can tell you that.
  8. 40/70 Benchmark
    I am willing to guess you have a long, and violent gender at 01-02 and 11-12 every cool ENSO I have questions about his methodology, too...but unlikely a pro met residing in Texas with over 40 years of experience is favoring big NE snow years as analogs out of bias. It's just a pet peeve of mine to ostracize and call bias bc you (collective not personal) do not like the composite outcome. Anyway, LC did very well last season FWIW.
  9. 40/70 Benchmark
    I don't think it's possible for you to ever favor a colder outcome. If you wanna question his methods, fine, but the guy isn't picking it analogs based upon waste coast snowfall....or by ENSO.
  10. 40/70 Benchmark
    I could def. deal with Cosgrove's analog composite lol.....1976, 1995, 2007 and 2020. Last year is the only one that wasn't outstanding here, but not concerned about LBSW in consecutive la ninas.
  11. 40/70 Benchmark
    Tossed.
  12. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yes...its going to be pretty close to the border of weak and mod.
  13. 40/70 Benchmark
    Agreed. Not best case, not worst case.
  14. 40/70 Benchmark
    My point isn't that it will be a carbon copy of last year...rather we should have some volatility...like last year.
  15. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yea, as they did last year. Central based la nina...not modoki, which is the kiss of death. Not east based, either...
  16. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yea, "well" is a relative term...when the other option is cyhphilis, then I'll be content with herpes.
  17. 40/70 Benchmark
    @snowman19I think what you are pining for is a modoki, which is solidly region 4 focused, not a central based event....the latter, like last year, is what this event is. It's more variable with mixed features of modoki and west-based events.
  18. 40/70 Benchmark
    Sure we can....its alot easier the more east based la nina is. Keep the coolest anonalies out of region 4.
  19. 40/70 Benchmark
    It is and has been a central based event..region 1.2 has positive anomalies, however, the coolest anomalies should steer clear of region 4. I haven't issued any forecast and won't until early November.
  20. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yea, especially down there...we can get away with it in NE. But +EPO sucks for everyone.
  21. 40/70 Benchmark
    Kev does...
  22. 40/70 Benchmark
    I doubt it. October is the steepest drop in climo...pretty tough to entirely compensate for that. Anomaly wise. sure...
  23. 40/70 Benchmark
    Its good provided that we get a mechanism in the n PAC to reposition the cold in AK southward...otherwise, cold in AK is 2001-2002, 2011-2012. lol
  24. 40/70 Benchmark
    The 1960's were predominately -PDO/-NAO.
  25. 40/70 Benchmark
    I think it takes a high-end winter off of the table for you guys, but you could still pull a 2010-2011 type season in which you do well, though still looking over your shoulder and grimacing at NE. But hey, at least the Pats suck now lol
×
×
  • Create New...