Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    67,735

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. 40/70 Benchmark
    Jack is ORH county to KCON on that.
  2. 40/70 Benchmark
    Whoo.... lol. I'm just screwing with you. NBD, but I'm quite confident that if you took a poll, the vast majority believes that you own a DIT pin cushion.
  3. 40/70 Benchmark
    There is my Jackman jack call from this AM
  4. 40/70 Benchmark
    Difference is you are fixated on Kevin, Hippy is not.
  5. 40/70 Benchmark
    You will never not bite lol
  6. 40/70 Benchmark
    I would not worry....snow will get thrown back farther up there bc mid levels will be mature.
  7. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yea, agree.
  8. 40/70 Benchmark
    No cheating, BOX...
  9. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yep.
  10. 40/70 Benchmark
    I will be happy with 2-3".
  11. 40/70 Benchmark
    I would not be surprised...feared that all along.
  12. 40/70 Benchmark
    Are you talking about the QPF charts, or mid level model depictions? if the mid levels trend east, and/or the system matures later, then yes.......but not because the QPF chart simply doesn't show big amounts. Models mainly resolve precipitation from low level forcing, but are not skilled with mid level deformation...vastly underdone.
  13. 40/70 Benchmark
    Exactly. The snowfall algorithm that I tout is superior with respect to distinguishing precip type issues, which is usually important for us. Most algorithms err by tallying mixed precvip as snow, which inflates the numbers. Mine does not to this, however, it is only based on the model, which usually will not resolve mid level banding properly. Thus it will miss the deformation axis to the NW of the low.
  14. 40/70 Benchmark
    Mid levels.
  15. 40/70 Benchmark
    Depends on the situation...generalizing algorithms is a fool's errand, so you seem like the right man for the job. I like it for resolving precip type, but not mid level banding. First Call...Final tomorrow. https://easternmassweather.blogspot.com/2020/12/developing-coastal-storm-to-impact-area.html
  16. 40/70 Benchmark
    You guys will do fine...I just said that often we will see late bloomers target NE of you for most.
  17. 40/70 Benchmark
    I think 6"+ is pretty reasonable in the ORH hills.
  18. 40/70 Benchmark
    Working on it ...
  19. 40/70 Benchmark
    Euro drops a 3-spot on me. I'd take that.
  20. 40/70 Benchmark
    I'd rather be a bit northeast of him, but yea.
  21. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yea, I could use more tic.
  22. 40/70 Benchmark
    No. Highest amounts will be near that W gradient.
  23. 40/70 Benchmark
    That is perfect.
  24. 40/70 Benchmark
    I'm in. All hail pope.
  25. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yea. We'll see.
×
×
  • Create New...