Maybe I did use a a model image of November temps to save time (not sure), but that wasn't a forecast composite and thus isn't plagarism. Not your tool or data, so no need to cite it.
What gets me is you call me an idiot for not using some of your methods, such as sensible weather analogs, which I did decide that there was value in. So I start incorporating it by developing my own sensible composite, then I get accused of plagarism... how in the hell does someone win with you??
Anyone else can feel free to compare out forecasts and make their own mind up. This is ridiculous.
As far as the NAO goes, the block is just developing and it's being negated by RNA in the early stages...that doesn't mean that the NAO is meaningless at baseline, as the graphic that I posted illustrates.