Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    72,423
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. You certainly can, but it's an uphill climb.
  2. You can, actually. Is it desirable or preferable, no.
  3. Its always something....system looked better, but the ridge out west collapsed faster.
  4. Look at at December 2022...how far did that blizzard just prior to Xmas trend west at like day 5? Crazy shit happens with PV lobe phases and blocks.
  5. Doesn't look good...agreed. But the lead time is a scientific reason to not write a large event off.
  6. Nonsense. Absolutely has a higher ceiling than Tuesday. However, I agree that we need to see a big move soon.
  7. And 18z was better than 12z. Do I think we are getting a huge event, no, but it is what it is.
  8. The point was the trend, which is what I referenced. Its not misleading in that respect.
  9. GEFS got better...new cluster just outside or the BM.
  10. This is what is so frustrating about seasonal efforts...you can nail all of the large scale hemispheric stuff, but just not have any of the synoptic sets ups pan out so your snowfall effort still ends up looking like shit.
  11. Yeah, only a precious few posts regarding GW on this forum.
  12. We may just end up needing to wait for the Pacific, if this whiffs.....exhausting hobby.
  13. I guess ideally, learn each model's strengths and weaknesses within the context of east coast cyclogensis in order to maximize their utility and in so doing, forecast proficiency/accuracy. I know the GFS tends to be overbearing with respect to the N stream...
  14. This is what I am getting at. Same with the UK. I guess if you wanna pin that chart over your bedpost and take it over the GFS, then you do you. I'll pass. But technically, I stand corrected. I did not know that.
  15. I need more than one month of data to trust the GEM over the GFS...I've heard the same crap about the UK, but time and time again its proven erratic.
×
×
  • Create New...