Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,476
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kmsrocknj
    Newest Member
    kmsrocknj
    Joined

January 2026 Short/Medium Range Thread


John1122
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Carvers Gap said:

The low in the Lakes is the problem.  It was behind the system so not sure if it sped up?

One thing I’ve noticed is that as much as I’ve watched these vort loops lately, those vorts near the lakes are not messing around. They’re moving substantially faster than stuff that gets strung out further south. Here today on a run, maybe gone tomorrow.
 

One thing that might have to be watched with some of these runs that trail vorticity back towards the high plains and front range, is some mischief if one gets hung up for a bit while the more northerly parts of the shortwave move along. 
 

that could go either way of course: it outruns the cold or gets just enough space to amplify at the right time. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Holston_River_Rambler said:

Interesting wrt the NAM vs RGEM. Usually seems like in the 40-60 hour range the NAM will be warm nosing any and all. 

As far as the RGEM, it still shows 4-6" in Harlan and Bell Counties in SEKY. Oddly, that drops to around 3" in Lee and Wise Counties. 850's look fine overall for the aforementioned area's. Nam 3k looks pretty Jacked for these Area's. Looks a bit worrisome a bit further South. 

 Model's have been all over the Place with the Setup so, right now, even at this close Range, we just don't know. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the temp issues in ETn but not so much in west or east of here, makes me think the mods are about to sniff out a handoff or energy transfer. Seems like when we get odd looking thermals up the valley, it’s a precursor to a low popping off the coast of SC.


.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, the mean is well west and into the E TN valley.  No idea if it can get this far, but you can see the jog.  You asked if this could jog northwest.  I do believe the trough could verify north of where it is show currently.  If so, this shifts the track.
ea756c29-abc8-42d2-be23-d7552911ec36.png

0Z will be worth staying up for imo.


.
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Scottie16 said:


0Z will be worth staying up for imo.


.

I still think it is a very long shot.  However, where we are seeing some of these systems rain instead of snow...tells me that modeling is over doing the cold and there is room for this to come north.  However, these Gulf snows verify more often than I care to enjoy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Carvers Gap said:

The low in the Lakes is the problem.  It was behind the system so not sure if it sped up?

Yep...I got to excited early in week and forgot one of the biggest rules for south of 40. GL low = no Bueno 99% of the time (outside mtns/plateau), messes with thermals just enough ahead of any week vort spinning around it. So not really enthusiastic about weekend either. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha! My parents have one on Okaloosa island! Ft. Walton area. Kicking myself for not going down last year!

To add to that post. They didn’t have any means to deal with it other than sand and a few good ole boys. The thing was where it fell on the sand, it took forever to melt! Now on the roads it melted on its on. Never would have guessed it. They didn’t have anything to compare it with, but it lasted a week on the beach in places especially flat areas slightly sloped back from the direct angle of the sun. Just completely unheard of!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...