Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,554
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RHiggins
    Newest Member
    RHiggins
    Joined

Pittsburgh/Western PA WINTER ‘25/‘26


 Share

Recommended Posts

Now that there is a consensus of a storm this weekend, models are all going to differ up until gametime on how much of the southern vort get absorbed. Gonna affect how north or south it goes. Even if every model shows they all fully absorb it, it only matters what happens at gametime and we won't have that answer any sooner. Time for me to stop getting caught up in every different model and run. Too tiring.:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, colonel717 said:

Now that there is a consensus of a storm this weekend, models are all going to differ up until gametime on how much of the southern vort get absorbed. Gonna affect how north or south it goes. Even if every model shows they all fully absorb it, it only matters what happens at gametime and we won't have that answer any sooner. Time for me to stop getting caught up in every different model and run. Too tiring.:)

I enjoy it but its more so just checking things. As long as you dont get emotionally invested in every model its fine. It used to piss me off seeing the models changing every run and "being fringed". Now its like meh just less to shovel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gordo74 said:

Still have to get it another couple hundred miles north for it to give us anything significant if we're to be in it. Looking more and more east to me.

Gfs  a big improvement over 12z. I think the 6” line is back to M/D line in western pa. I think this storm has been talked about so much already, it’s easy to forget  it’s still 4+ days out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean. Isn’t this what we always see? 5 days out the models show 48” Of snow somewhere.  Ends up shifting north and less snow.  Honestly some of these model runs with how much snow they give Deep South. It would be a disaster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SteelCity87 said:

Does anyone remember how much QPF fell during February 5th-6th 2010 storm? I know we had good ratios but couldn't find any data. 

I feel like that was some heavy snow I had to shovel and not pixie dust. If I remember looking at qpf maps. It was just a qpf bomb. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rd9108 said:

I feel like that was some heavy snow I had to shovel and not pixie dust. If I remember looking at qpf maps. It was just a qpf bomb. 

Less clown maps in those days. It was a lot of looking at the QPF and assuming. I remember seeing 2.5” or so modeled at one point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Rd9108 said:

I feel like that was some heavy snow I had to shovel and not pixie dust. If I remember looking at qpf maps. It was just a qpf bomb. 

Ah ok. For some reason I thought I remembered the temperatures being around 20° but I must be confused. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Rd9108 said:

I feel like that was some heavy snow I had to shovel and not pixie dust. If I remember looking at qpf maps. It was just a qpf bomb. 

Correct. Lots of qpf with wet, heavy snow that pasted to everything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Burghblizz said:

Less clown maps in those days. It was a lot of looking at the QPF and assuming. I remember seeing 2.5” or so modeled at one point.

Haha I remember always trying to take the qpf and predicted temps and looking at the  snow ratio chart haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, southpark said:

Do they not know how to math? Where does the other 10% fall? They only have 90% accounted for?

Yes, there must be a 10% chance of something other than one of those three scenarios occurring. Maybe a few percent chance of a cutter, and the balance on a northward curve along the coast that is too far east to produce measurable snowfall (i.e., hybrid of cases 1 & 2).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TheClimateChanger said:

Yes, there must be a 10% chance of something other than one of those three scenarios occurring. Maybe a few percent chance of a cutter, and the balance on a northward curve along the coast that is too far east to produce measurable snowfall (i.e., hybrid of cases 1 & 2).

Their Facebook post actually has option 3 with 30% so that is where I am putting the extra 10%.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...