TheClimateChanger Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheClimateChanger Posted Friday at 02:36 AM Share Posted Friday at 02:36 AM 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheClimateChanger Posted Friday at 06:29 PM Share Posted Friday at 06:29 PM 15 hours ago, TheClimateChanger said: Update for late reporting cooperative observation sites. Falcon Dam recorded a high of 106F yesterday! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheClimateChanger Posted Saturday at 02:06 AM Share Posted Saturday at 02:06 AM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheClimateChanger Posted Saturday at 01:18 PM Share Posted Saturday at 01:18 PM 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheClimateChanger Posted Saturday at 01:18 PM Share Posted Saturday at 01:18 PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheClimateChanger Posted Sunday at 08:24 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:24 PM 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheClimateChanger Posted Monday at 12:05 AM Share Posted Monday at 12:05 AM Some more information on that one... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WolfStock1 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Not an expert in UHI effects, but Lander isn't exactly the middle of nowhere - it is a town of 7k+ people. What's needed is data like this from actual remote sites, that aren't at cities / towns at all - e.g. sensors at national parks / forests, etc. Remove all question w/regards to UHI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheClimateChanger Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, WolfStock1 said: Not an expert in UHI effects, but Lander isn't exactly the middle of nowhere - it is a town of 7k+ people. What's needed is data like this from actual remote sites, that aren't at cities / towns at all - e.g. sensors at national parks / forests, etc. Remove all question w/regards to UHI. We've had that for 21, going on 22, years - it's called the United States Climate Reference Network and it shows more, not less, warming than the official numbers over the period of overlap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WolfStock1 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 59 minutes ago, TheClimateChanger said: We've had that for 21, going on 22, years - it's called the United States Climate Reference Network and it shows more, not less, warming than the official numbers over the period of overlap. Hmmm - well - looking at their locations https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/crn/ - that's not really what I'm talking about. It looks like just about all of those sites are actually suburban sites, or at least "close to city" rural sites. For example the one in central NC is in Duke Forest - but that's practically surrounded by Durham, which is a fast-growing urban area. The one in southern LA is at Cade Farm which is rural-ish, but is only 3 miles from the edge of Lafayette. The one in western VA is only 1 mile from I-64 and Charlottesville, Etc. What I'm talking about would be truly rural sites - ones where there isn't a significant city within about 50-100 miles or so. I see very few if any sites of those that fit that bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 55 minutes ago, WolfStock1 said: Hmmm - well - looking at their locations https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/crn/ - that's not really what I'm talking about. It looks like just about all of those sites are actually suburban sites, or at least "close to city" rural sites. For example the one in central NC is in Duke Forest - but that's practically surrounded by Durham, which is a fast-growing urban area. The one in southern LA is at Cade Farm which is rural-ish, but is only 3 miles from the edge of Lafayette. The one in western VA is only 1 mile from I-64 and Charlottesville, Etc. What I'm talking about would be truly rural sites - ones where there isn't a significant city within about 50-100 miles or so. I see very few if any sites of those that fit that bill. Blairsville, GA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WolfStock1 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, GaWx said: Blairsville, GA Here are the Georgia sites: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted 54 minutes ago Share Posted 54 minutes ago 21 minutes ago, WolfStock1 said: Here are the Georgia sites: 1) Cumberland is certainly rural: https://www.nps.gov/cuis/planyourvisit/staffordbeach.htm 2)-3) Ichauway appears quite rural, too: https://www.jonesctr.org/about-us/ 4) Colham Ferry appears to be a burb of Watkinsville, a town with only ~3K: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watkinsville,_Georgia#:~:text=Watkinsville is the largest city,County%2C Georgia Metropolitan Statistical Area. ———— What do you think of these 4 as far as not having UHI to worry about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WolfStock1 Posted 39 minutes ago Share Posted 39 minutes ago 11 minutes ago, GaWx said: 1) Cumberland is certainly rural: https://www.nps.gov/cuis/planyourvisit/staffordbeach.htm 2)-3) Ichauway appears quite rural, too: https://www.jonesctr.org/about-us/ 4) Colham Ferry appears to be a burb of Watkinsville, a town with only ~3K: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watkinsville,_Georgia#:~:text=Watkinsville is the largest city,County%2C Georgia Metropolitan Statistical Area. ———— What do you think of these 4 as far as not having UHI to worry about? Yes unlike many of the others Georgia appears to have done a good job picking truly remote sites. Ideally you'd like to see all the sites be like that, since it's usually an average of all sites that's shown (e.g. in the X post). I haven't looked for it, but was just noticing that a lot of the references in this thread to records / high trends are in areas that may be subject to UHI effect. Would be nice to see some for remote sites instead, since IMO that's much more meaningful. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted 26 minutes ago Share Posted 26 minutes ago 15 minutes ago, WolfStock1 said: Yes unlike many of the others Georgia appears to have done a good job picking truly remote sites. Ideally you'd like to see all the sites be like that, since it's usually an average of all sites that's shown (e.g. in the X post). I haven't looked for it, but was just noticing that a lot of the references in this thread to records / high trends are in areas that may be subject to UHI effect. Would be nice to see some for remote sites instead, since IMO that's much more meaningful. Do you or does anyone else know how much these 4 GA locations warmed? I’d really like to know due to their supposed lack of UHI effect. @TheClimateChanger @donsutherland1 @chubbs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now