Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

WxChallenge 2014-2015


Jurg

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Well, this became my drop city overnight with that low. I need to really step my game up in order to climb back above national, although I can figure out this place on how to forecast. Looks like they have a good system now, so hopefully that helps. How's everyone else looking?

 

Overall precipitation, Day 2 wind, and today's low is really hurting me. Consensus is almost into Top 100, so this is likely a bad city for many people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like everyone else I'm just hanging in there, precipitation in particular is killing me so far. Went 24/14/19/0 for today. I had a strong feeling the low was going low but had trouble completely ignoring the USL...

 

Glad some of you have you have done well enough for this to be your drop city. I used mine up already so gotta finish strong to maintain edge of tourney territory heading into next semester.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I want to complain about this city, I'm likely somewhere inside Top 250 going into Day 4. That, by itself, is a personal victory after disaster of Day 2. With 5 days to go, I'm nowhere close to folding on this city. 

Might need to be in the top 100 to be above National Consensus after next week. Just think about that. You do well, but not really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What in the hell is wrong with this place? Even when it isn't snowing, it still records precip. It definitely didn't just snow 0.05" in the past hour because Radar was clear over them during that time.

 

Day 3 should be 0.1" not 0.15".

 

They'll probably do the liquid equivalent measurement again anyway and make the METAR amounts moot.

 

They still have the high on day 1 and the wind on day 2 wrong (should be 26F and 22kts, respectively). Both of those hurt my position. :( Just sent an email about those errors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They'll probably do the liquid equivalent measurement again anyway and make the METAR amounts moot.

 

They still have the high on day 1 and the wind on day 2 wrong (should be 26F and 22kts, respectively). Both of those hurt my position. :( Just sent an email about those errors.

But you agree that the 0.05" that hour was bogus?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They'll probably do the liquid equivalent measurement again anyway and make the METAR amounts moot.

 

They still have the high on day 1 and the wind on day 2 wrong (should be 26F and 22kts, respectively). Both of those hurt my position. :( Just sent an email about those errors.

 

Was about to send an email about those errors. Could you provide feedback for what you find out? I don't want to bombard Jeff with too many emails.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was about to send an email about those errors. Could you provide feedback for what you find out? I don't want to bombard Jeff with too many emails.

 

I never got any response to my email on Monday about the (then) erroneous wind verifications on the climo... in this case, even if I don't get a response, as long as it's fixed that's what matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never got any response to my email on Monday about the (then) erroneous wind verifications on the climo... in this case, even if I don't get a response, as long as it's fixed that's what matters.

It just seems like the errors are just piling up in this city lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never got any response to my email on Monday about the (then) erroneous wind verifications on the climo... in this case, even if I don't get a response, as long as it's fixed that's what matters.

 

Gotcha. Well if it isn't fixed by this weekend I'll check in. And agreed about the response part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phil is killing it here. Other than precip, winds, and high temp, the HRRR has really propelled him to the front. I guess I should start giving it more credit.

 

FYP  :P

 

a bit late to the game, but really like you HRRR tools Phil. Certainly factoring them in to my forecasts.

 

Thanks! I do want to mention that the old sounding link that I posted earlier is no longer working because the NCAR 3D hrrr files I have been using haven't updated since December 2nd... try this link which uses the more stable NCEP 3D hrrr files. In the future when I have more time I'll probably put together a dedicated webpage that will house all the graphics.

 

KANJ Forecast Sounding using NCEP-HRRR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31/17/12/0.01

 

The high is still running cool, so I went with that number. The low? I have no idea except dewpoint is low and HRRR is trending toward mid-10s with most high-res in upper-10s. I think we can get 12 knots somewhere there, but I could get burned there. Also got 0.01 because I've no idea once again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went with 33/16/12/0

 

This was a quick forecast and I really don't have any idea any more. They have a window this evening if they can get some breaks in the clouds to cool before the winds pick up as we head towards 6z. The HRRR is really cold again. It was too cold last night but had the right idea at least, so we'll see. Went a bit aggressive on the high and wind but I don't "think" either is unreasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32/22/12/0.02. Taking risks already because Nat Con seems to be running away with it. I didn't see the HRRR that cold tonight on the soundings from Phil's page at least like past days. Probably like around -6C the coldest, so I feel ok with my gutsy low since last time in southerly flow and cloudiness overnight models were too cold for the morning. Hopefully it actually works for once this time lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HRRR is not preforming well with respect to reality right now... HRRR analysis has KANJ in the mid teens right now, while in reality the ASOS is sitting at 22 as of 05 UTC... d'oh. Looks like the primary problem is extra cloud cover that wasn't well handled by even the higher resolution guidance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...