Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,640
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. CMC is actually more amped than 00z lmao. blizzard verbatim
  2. i’ve noticed that the AIFS can be just as wrong as other models but its shifts are just less violent for example, it can still move 100-200 miles in a few days, it’ll just do it in small, consistent increments rather than two big jumps
  3. probably some of both, mostly some too far east. however, that is an extremely aggressive mean at this range
  4. EPS with a 6-8” mean for NYC
  5. the ensemble support and general pattern favorability is what makes this so exciting IMO
  6. EPS is insane. better than 12z
  7. slight amplification trend on the GEPS, lol
  8. bit of a trend, no? EPS is looking great, btw
  9. all four models have a hit. wasn’t expecting that
  10. can’t believe we went four for four tonight
  11. yeah, much more like foreign guidance
  12. lol you’d think this was an awful winter for the area. let’s ignore the EPS, 12z OP ECMWF, GEPS, UKMET because of the GFS and AIFS
  13. it’s been flopping around for days. not any better than any other piece of guidance
  14. that isn't progressive. PNA is stronger and there is a strong closed low over MN. the low will pivot and bring PVA up
  15. ECMWF looks just like the 12z EPS. nice to see
  16. if this was the other way around with the GFS/GEFS only showing something and everything else relatively unenthused, the GFS would be launched to Pluto
  17. that kicker actually helps pump the PNA for a brief time as the trough amps. pretty common before it flattens things, but if the spark is already lit it doesn't matter
×
×
  • Create New...