Jump to content

KPITSnow

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,994

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by KPITSnow

  1. KPITSnow
    Yep, seeing that out our way. We have a few decent bands but it is mainly a disorganized mess.
  2. KPITSnow
    I know i will be called a debbie downer, but there have been a lot of signals for this to have huge bust potential. I think a lot of people are underestimating that 1 inch of QPF spread out over 36 hours when temps are at least somewhat marginal could lead to huge bust issues.
  3. KPITSnow
    Western PA is pretty crappy right now. The radar is an absolute mess.
  4. KPITSnow
    I hope, but the models had been hinting at this especially the NAM. Like I said sure it showed .6 or .7 QPF but over 36 hours or so, and that really isn’t going to accumulate very well.
  5. KPITSnow
    Do you have it for western pa? I think we are in big trouble out here.
  6. KPITSnow
    Waking up and the radar looks pretty crappy.
  7. KPITSnow
    I’m still ok with that call
  8. KPITSnow
    See I think the problem is that with marginal temps it might be hard for it to accumulate if it is snowing at a quarter inch an hour for 36 hours.
  9. KPITSnow
    Again, very important to note here that this literally does fall over almost two days.
  10. KPITSnow
    Yeah, maybe. I would love for MAG to chime in on that as even to my untrained eyes it looks weird as all hell.
  11. KPITSnow
    Look, I don't want to start a flame war, but yes it is still snowing, but those are extremely light rates. QPF isn't terrible on the NAM, but it is spread over a VERY long time
  12. KPITSnow
    YEah, it is a very weird looking progression.
  13. KPITSnow
    Appreciate the positivity and play by play, but this NAM run is pretty ugly. There might be decent QPF but it is over like 36 hours, and without having very low temps its going to really drive down accumulations.
  14. KPITSnow
    Ok, I'll be the first to say it. The NAM looks like an absolute disorganized mess.
  15. KPITSnow
    Figures that the 0z NAM is literally the first model I have looked at this storm and it is an absolute mess. We get a decent amount of QPF, like .5 inch or a bit more but it is over like 36 hours of light snow.
  16. KPITSnow
    Man, I didn't realize how long duration this is going to be...the NAM is a disorganized mess but it looks like it is going to snow for like 2 days straight.
  17. KPITSnow
    SO Kpit is still showing 3-5, and I am extremely confused by what they are seeing. YEah, it might be a long duration event but I think 6-10 out here is much more realistic than their call,
  18. KPITSnow
    KPIT did a really good job with the december event. I am not 100% sure what they are doing with this one though.
  19. KPITSnow
    Is that bad?
  20. KPITSnow
    I haven’t really followed this because I honestly expected slop, but I think 6-10 is reasonable.
  21. KPITSnow
    Honestly happens way too often. Don’t really want to go down this route again but when I read our discussions compared to neighboring offices I’m pretty amazed at the difference in detail.
  22. KPITSnow
    Is there any way this could bump far enough north to give DC nothing? Asking for a friend.
  23. KPITSnow
    Their forecasts aren’t aligned...at all lol.
  24. KPITSnow
    Spot on. I think we can absolutely notice the lack of LE events and clippers, which used to be much more common.
  25. KPITSnow
    Nah, give me what we had in December as opposed to a bunch or 1 inch events. I'd like another couple events but I am fairly satisfied already for the year.
×
×
  • Create New...