Jump to content

olafminesaw

Members
  • Posts

    3,060
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by olafminesaw

  1. 15 hours ago, so_whats_happening said:

    So how often do we see the potential of a system lasting not only to Hawaii ( I feel like this is a 1 in 5 year type of thing for Hawaii) but also going even into the WPAC?

    gfs_z500_mslp_global_fh0-384.gif

    I count only three - Ruth (1965), Winona (1989), & Ruth (1994). This is counting storms that passed within 100 miles of HI, & is inexact based on the crossover longitude as the NOAA doesn't display them. Winona is perhaps the most impressive in that it formed East of Hawaii and struck the Philippines as a tropical depression.

    • Like 1
  2. At GSO, the percentage  of years in which the first 90 degree day falls in each month are as follows:

    March:1.7%

    April: 18.6%

    May: 45.8%

    June: 30.5%

    July: 3.4% (4 years out of 118)

    Funnily enough, 2 out of the 4 years that made it to July were 2017 & 2020, and we haven't had a March or April date since 2006.

    It's going to be really close to making it to July, with a forecast high of 89 on Friday.

    • Like 2
  3. 23 minutes ago, eyewall said:

    I am waiting to see if any discretes pop off the lee trough before working back toward the Triangle

     

    Going to be a couple more hours until storms initiate per the HRRR. Still a weak cap per the meso analysis, although eroded significantly since this morning.

  4. 26 minutes ago, kvegas-wx said:

    Man I dont want to see large hail.  Some of the videos from AR, MS, TX, CO have me spooked!  And I hate to see my hard work on the crops this year go to waste.

    Sun is already bright here in the Triad.

    FWIW, I think the latest SPC discussion is a lot less enthusiastic about a higher end threat. Seems like CAPE values are lagging a bit and CAMS have less impressive parameters. Might be the sweet spot where we get some fun storms without having to worry too much about damage.

  5. 21 minutes ago, wncsnow said:

    I think this mornings MCS will really limit things west of 77. Not that it's the prime spot anyways. 

    Actually I think the opposite, cloud cover will linger East of 77, through around lunchtime for the triad (per the HRRR) that may limit CAPE somewhat, but areas west of 77 are about to get full sun. 

  6. 59 minutes ago, eyewall said:

    I plan on headed out toward the Triad and points west to see if I can catch some discretes before upscale growth occurs.

    SPC is definitely highlighting the hail threat, citing the potential for isolated very large hail. The last hatched hail event from SPC was May 23, 2014. 

    • Thanks 1
  7. 1 hour ago, eyewall said:

    He then said it may be due to moth/insect damage.

     

    This makes more sense. Cool temps don't prevent foliage. It would have to be consistently dropping below freezing at night for temps to be the cause 

    • Like 2
  8. With the majority of the rain behind us, time to look ahead to Monday to our next severe threat. Not a particularly high ceiling, but looks like it could be an enhanced type day if the timing is right

    ...DISCUSSION...
    ...Monday/Day 4...
    An upper-level low is forecast to move across the Great Lakes region
    on Monday, as an associated trough moves into the upper Ohio Valley
    and southern Appalachians. A moist airmass, with surface dewpoints
    in the lower 70s F, will likely be in place from the Carolinas
    north-northeastward into the Mid-Atlantic. Moderate instability is
    forecast to develop across much of this moist airmass by afternoon.
    Thunderstorms that form in the higher terrain will move
    east-northeastward into the Appalachian foothills during the
    afternoon. The instability combined with moderate deep-layer shear
    and steep low-level lapse rates will likely result in a some severe
    storms. Wind damage and hail are expected to be the primary threats.
    

    severe_ml_day4_gefso_062712.png

    • Like 1
  9. 1 minute ago, calculus1 said:

    While it may be incorrect, it is also quite possible for rainfall values to be quite varied over a very limited distance. If you do have it under a tree, your data will definitely be skewed, but most likely through underreporting rather than over reporting.

    Not under a tree, probably like 10 feet from the edge of canopy. I was thinking maybe it collects water and gets blown into the gauge.

    • Like 1
  10. Just got a new basic rain gauge recently, reporting over 3.5" on the day. I think that's definitely higher than it should be. Local obs and radar suggest 2-2.5". Any ideas why it's so high? I tried to put it in an opening but we have massive oak trees that surely skew the data. 

×
×
  • Create New...