Hoth

We will rebuild.

That's an awesome map, Steve. Spot on for my area. I was trying to break 10" on the season and sure enough, the line is just to my north.

Kudos for raising the next generations of weenies.

We had the same tease in Jan '19. Everything on the modeling looked awesome, Ray was crowing about how his seasonal forecast looked spot on, and then poof.

Didn't shovel once this season. Amazing.

Brother outside Worcester reports lightning hit a tree in his yard. Best outbreak of the year probably lol.

Ripcord brings back memories. First double I ever did as a kid.

And we rain. That'll do it for this winter in all likelihood.

Nice fatties coming down. Grass whitening a bit, but mainly wet.

In and out bursts of snow. Not sticking.

lol classic valley hole right over my head.

Got a few flakes falling now. It's good for the soul.

Yeah, that's probably a decent representation of a mild case, or about 60-70% of cases. On the flipside, there's stuff like this: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/virus-kills-chinese-film-director-100442476.html

Five days on average and up to 9 on some surfaces in a cool, humid environment.

I'm curious where you saw it doesn't spread as fast as the flu. From what I've read, typical flu has an R nought of around 1.25-1.5, with a severe pandemic like 1918 closer to 2. I've seen estimates for COVID19 ranging from 2 to 6. Case tracking and diligent isolation help lower that transmission rate, but once community spread takes hold even measures like China took can only reduce the infection rate so much. It does buy time though, which is important in preventing healthcare systems from breaking down. The trade off is, to prevent unchecked growth, you have to basically shut down your economy, which has its own knock on risks.

lol, and since social distancing is useful in preventing transmission, mission accomplished.

You've heard of bitcoin. TP becomes the new shitcoin.

For sure. We're talking about risk mitigation, not elimination.

So why do doctors in hospitals bother with them?

I don't mean to stoke fear at all, but I think preparedness and precautions are important. We're probably conditioned to be complacent because we haven't seen a threat like this in a long time. Here's an interview with Richard Hatchett, which I found to be pretty even-keeled and on the ball.

Saudis and Kuwait doing the same. I haven't seen any signs of people taking precautions here yet. It's classic normalcy bias at work. We've had some business continuity discussions at work, figuring out what operations we can cut, what can be done from home, and I know Yale is gearing up for an expected shutdown/quarantine scenario, but everyone seems to be taking a reactive vs proactive approach. Nobody wearing masks or gloves at supermarkets, people going out bars and restaurants and churches as usual. I expect we're going to see the exponential nature of COVID spread in the next couple weeks, not so much in test results, which will probably follow a linear model owing to the limits of availability, but in the rise of anecdotal talk of families falling ill, schools closing, hospitals suddenly swamped etc. etc. My boss has a friend who works for Bridgewater, Ray Dalio's giant hedge fund, which seems to be taking the proactive approach. They were dismissed to work from home indefinitely last week (which is interesting since they are in Westport and there were no reported cases in CT yet). You figure a place like that probably has one of the best risk management departments extant, with high level contacts across the spectrum of policy makers, virologists etc., so they know what's happening. Probably no coincidence that banks, Amazon, Google etc. are all banning corporate travel and increasingly moving towards telecommuting too. It will eventually sink in with the general public, but the damage will be done by then.

It's just a fantasy. It's not the real thing. Sometimes a fantasy is all you need.

Now first case in VT.

My understanding is that it's one of the defining symptoms of COVID19. That's how it was initially discovered in China, as an abnormal pneumonia that didn't fit any known disease profile. Along with fever, dry cough and muscular weakness, pneumonia appears to be pretty common, especially as the disease progresses into the second or third week. It's probably the primary reason a high percentage of people require hospitalization. The infection gets deep in the lungs and produces abnormally dense sputum that can't be cleared by coughing. That drives hypoxia and organ failure without intensive care in more serious cases. There have been cases requiring intensive manual ventilation for upwards of a month to keep them alive. There was even a lung transplant in China because a patient developed severe fibrosis. Anyway, here's an early study of patients in Wuhan from the Lancet: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30183-5/fulltext

If a young person gets pneumonia from this and the hospital capacity has been taxed to the point of breaking, mortality will increase in that group too. Just not enough doctors/ventilators etc. to treat everyone. We may not even be in the early innings here; the players are only now taking the field.