this debate is settle-able with the simple comprehension ( or should be 'simple' ) that everything in reality, including reality its self, exists on a probability spectrum, the either end of which is falsely assumed to be absolute.
there is no 0, and there is no 100, at the boundaries. they are 'asymptotes'
if you placed a gun against your temple, and pulled the trigger, there is no 100% chance of that the bullet successfully tunneling through your brain at twice the speed of sound. there is, however, a very high degree of confidence ... stemming from an exceptionally high degree of probability of that actually taking place.
just like there is an exceptionally low probability that the sun will not rise tomorrow - the chances of that are in fact ... NOT absolutely 0.
everything exists between those two end points along a probability spectrum; as it concerns common everyday experience and application, is semantics.
when people are spiking foot balls... they are semantically ( and yes sometimes dimwittedly ) pressing their outlook toward the which ever end - usually for the purposes of hyperbole, at other times, 'whining'.
then, those that are sensy types ... get offended by the hyperbole and whinny ...and feel like cops on a crusade to keep everyone verbally unoffensive.
in either case... it's a debate that really only defines which side is has a greater coefficient of fullofshitness.