Jump to content

mitchnick

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    28,342

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Everything posted by mitchnick

  1. mitchnick
    Euro operational has the inverted trough too
  2. mitchnick
    Stop looking at so often and stats should improve.
  3. mitchnick
    There's that inverted trough creeping eastward as I suggested it would after 12z runs. By the time it's over, it'll be over the Gulf Stream probably.
  4. mitchnick
    18z Gefs snowfall look a lot like 12z Ukie ensembles I posted earlier.
  5. mitchnick
    See above
  6. mitchnick
    Corresponding precip map looks encouraging.
  7. mitchnick
    18z Canadian GEM at max range of 84hrs on the run.
  8. mitchnick
    That includes the rain this week. Look at the top.
  9. mitchnick
    I wasn't looking at the model, just reading the thread.
  10. mitchnick
    Somebody get her a glass of water, she's going to faint over the Gfs....HURRY!!!
  11. mitchnick
    95% chance I'll be dribbling out of my mouth asleep, dreaming about having to wash and blow dry a full head of hair when it comes out tonight. That job is for another.
  12. mitchnick
    Ukie ensembles only because they may provide false hope.
  13. mitchnick
    Yes and no. It'll get better again before it gets worse.
  14. mitchnick
    Canadian ensembles fwiw
  15. mitchnick
    Pretty Swan in PA.
  16. mitchnick
    Who knows....maybe end up looking better than 12z! Lol By the way, aren't Euros a bit late?
  17. mitchnick
    It just doesn't effin' wanna' end up here. Ughh
  18. mitchnick
    Inverted troughs always seem to trend east since I've watched them. Again, never 100%, but enough to feel like east of the mts are in a decent spot imho.
  19. mitchnick
    Meh...AiGfs finally got the memo with the weak inverted trough.
  20. mitchnick
    All I'll say is, I just hope this one works out for everyone to prove my opinion for this year wrong.
  21. mitchnick
    Man, Icon is trying.
  22. mitchnick
    I don't care who believes me frankly. But for this forum, it often works. And there's nothing anyone can say that changes my mind. Lol
  23. mitchnick
    Don't need them. Just multiply 10:1 numbers by .8!
  24. mitchnick
    The writing was on the wall early in the season. Like I said in December and several times since, you really want to be in the bullseye with the first threat. To the naysayers, NO...., it doesn't always work out that way (think 2007 clipper that put us ahead of Boston only to be our biggest event that winter while ENE did well.) But it's reliable enough to assume the area that does bullseye first will end the season with the highest snowfall anomalies as the pattern will tend repeat through the season imho.
  25. mitchnick
    I don't know. But thought I'd mention it because I would guess it's a possibility. You know us snow weenies...terribly vindictive! Lol
×
×
  • Create New...