Aren't the official tropical outlooks created by inputting a slew of various parameters with applications of physics, incorporating climatology, and running simulations upon simulations to derive the forecasts?
The hyper active forecasts seemed to rely on two major factors;
1) Decaying EL Nino and developing La Nina.
2) The record warm waters/OHC going through spring.
We'll see what happens through the next 8 weeks, but let's say even if we tack on another 7-8 storms, maybe 75% of those achieve hurricane status, 1-2 of those become major, and we don't see any significant landfalling impacts and the season ends at this.
Instead of folks admitting the forecast was off, Beryl will be used to justify because of ridiculously high ACE. That's ridiculous. There is no questioning Beryl was in the historic category, however, you can't use that one storm to define the entire season. I mean you can but the truth of the matter is that one storm was not reflective of the entire story. If you got 52 inches of snow during the winter (and your average is like 49'') but 25'' of that came within one storm, are you going to quantify the winter as "epic" because of that one storm. That one storm was not reflective of the season, it was reflective of short-term processes.