Jump to content

weatherwiz

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    77,006
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by weatherwiz

  1. At this juncture I highly doubt we're getting any assistance from the northern stream...which never seemed highly likely anyways. The flow is just too progressive. Sure there have been hints at more northern stream involvement...but they've been just that...hints. There was never any major support or backing from this possibility outside of "if x happens then y will occur".
  2. This type of stuff pisses me off... why even post a comparison to March of 1993 if you're going to say "oh but its unlikely" This happens on twitter a ton...there will be a post "Oh here's the GFS solution and snow map for D11 showing potential for 20-30''...but it's extremely unlikely to happen" Like what's the point of the post??? This does nothing but create hype and create a false sense...it's garbage like this which is leading the public to lose faith in meteorologists. I have a friend who is in the landscaping business and he is very in-tune with the weather...checks information across all platforms, asks for my feedback, and he'll show me stuff which he comes across and he says to me...he talks to alot of people in the business (landscaping) and they get pissed when they come across information like that.
  3. Can't believe I missed this post! I am thrilled for what you have had to say as it reinforces much of what I had sort of noted myself. That's also great information about the difference between top and bottom number...I think I used to use the top number quite a bit for gusts then started realizing it was a bit too aggressive so had started going with the bottom number. What I've found seem to find with bufkit is I don't think it handles winds out west very well. Some cities I forecast for are Oakland, CA, Ontario, CA, and Carlsbad, CA and just today I saw the HWW in Ontario and my forecasts for winds are way, way, way off
  4. I kinda disagree...there are times when I totally understand "bashing" forecast models but I don't think that is appropriate in this situation. Every single process involved in this potential was highly complex...perhaps one of the more complex scenarios you'll see. It's almost impossible to expect forecast models to 1) handle a situation like this well 2) show consistency (both run-to-run and model-to-model). When you have a progressive flow, numerous pieces of embedded s/w energy, potential for any type of phasing, and questions with how the pattern will evolve...which is based on numerous other factors...the forecast models just aren't going to do exceptionally well.
  5. Not even February yet and it's already 61 pages
  6. yeah that's becoming a bit more interesting. I would watch out sometime next week (and a period where models don't show anything)...if that ejects there is opportunity to coincide with some northern stream energy.
  7. yeah I don't think there is anyway possible you could forecast something that obscene months out...unless of course you had a blaring signal like in 2018.
  8. yeah your December call was pretty damn good...I was real excited after December (especially since BDL pulled off like 26'') but we just couldn't keep it going.
  9. I would take it. I don't have the whole snowpack fetish so I'm completely fine with getting pounded with snow and then having it go away in a few days. When snow starts piling up it leads to more hassle than it's worth
  10. Nice...good call. Seems like that's exactly what is happening. I think I've read around some saying this happening earlier in winter...unless I completely misread. Hell maybe we'll have a blockbuster March...not totally unrealistic and it happened as recently as two years ago
  11. that's not terrible. I see what you mean though about after the first week of February. That's quite the significant change. Now...whether that is valid remains to be seen.
  12. I believe that is correct. I just looked at QBO numbers and indeed that does fit the notion for a +AO. (Also the zonal wind map posted verifies +QBO). I do remember reading some outlooks talking about the QBO descending to easterly...so many that didn't happen as thought? Or there is a (mis)conception that it becoming less positive over time would favor blocking...lol...like a weenie wish cast (ohhh yeah the QBO is westerly...but it's becoming less westerly so blocking)
  13. what's 500 look like? Just judging from that but looks like a gradient-type pattern could setup?
  14. It's really hard to see any assistance from the stratosphere or PV at this juncture so we'll have to get help somewhere else. The stratosphere above the Arctic looks rather cold with the PV on the strong side. If zonal winds around 50mb can relax a bit perhaps that can assist with the PV displacing south...but they've been pretty strong this month: I wish there was more information available regarding the QBO. What's become apparently obvious with the QBO (and just like any other measure of variability) is it's the structure of the wind anomalies and how they're propagating/descending. So while a raw look at the number may have provided hope for some assistance from blocking perhaps the overall structure argued against it.
  15. That is probably the final chance to drastically change things. If we get closer and that is delayed further it will become very difficult to make things happen in time. The signal for changes in the Pacific have seemed to be pretty consistent, however, the Arctic is not really cooperating...which kinda sucks b/c based on some of the changes in the Pacific we don't need a ton of changes in the Arctic but the look doesn't seem very appealing. Hopefully with the MJO signal weakening that will jump start changes.
  16. I don't really see how things change moving through February. I think winter is cooked...it's not a good sign to see hardly cold air into Canada moving into February...then when you think about the processes which need to take place to completely change this and how much time is involved...we're past climo and all of a sudden we're kissing the equinox. Heck...there are times next week the -10C line at 850 is well into northern Canada.
  17. Could sun tan on top of the hot tub next week
  18. What's concerning though entering February is there just doesn't seem to be much in the way of cold air into Canada...PAC air continues to be flooded into Canada.
  19. I would think something has to give entering the second week of January with forecast models indicating such an intense ULJ...looks like you get a situation where the STJ and PJ phase and there's a pretty significant storm with that and then a major pattern change behind it? Didn't we actually experience something similar last winter (and around the same time?)...there was the record ulvl winds measured across several Northeast balloon launch locations
  20. Euro not as aggressive with the pants tent jet stream but still over 180 knots over SNE. This is actually going to be fun to watch this next week
  21. more like towels Funny thing is...unlike all these fake snow threats everyone drools over the severe wx threat will likely verify.
×
×
  • Create New...