weatherwiz

In the vicinity of where the coastal front sets up. While I am a bit skeptical on this I think there is room to get some rather impressive ratios where lift can be maximized and that will go along way. There's also going to be a tremendous amount of moisture thrown into the initial cold airmass.

I could see a rather substantial coastal front with this and a subsequent band of extremely heavy snow. Something maybe upwards of 12-18''. Missed your first call so not sure what your thoughts on on this.

You don't think the majority of our QPF would come as snow? I'm still a bit torn on how much we torch inland but looks like much of the QPF is snow then we change over...and by that point we may already be beginning to dry slot? I know it's too far out too really dig into bufkit but this was encouraging to see

I could see a situation where there is rather large temperature gradient between the immediate coastline and just inland. The GFS anyways is trying really hard to get that secondary going. Just based off the 18z run I'm inclined to think it's boundary layer warmth is a bit overdone inland. The issue though is those dynamics coming off the ocean are pretty strong. Even if we were to see warmth at the sfc, I would think it's relatively shallow and by the time we see that occur...much of the damage (QPF) has already fallen. The amount of moisture which is going to be thrown into the cold air mass initially is going to be insane with those llvl dynamics.

I'm still on the train (and I guess speaking specifically about CT here) that we probably dry slot before any type of changeover occurs...or the amount of precip which falls during the change over process is very little. The thump with this is going to be very impressive here. The problem (which will limit accumulation potential) is snow ratios are likely going to be pretty junky. Although I'm not totally 100% sold on this. There's going to be some phenomenal lift with this. It may be too early for these details but noting that the 18z GFS bufkit for BDL actually pushes ratios upwards of 15:1. This is likely dependent on the degree of lift into the DGZ. If the snow is more wet in nature (which this has to be a consideration) then power outages could become a problem b/c I still think we would be seeing several-plus inches of snow. One other huge key with this system, especially when you're talking about interior New England is this system is likely going to occlude rather quickly and moisture inflow will essentially be choked off. This system could fall apart rapidly upon approach.

There is a great deal on the line with this storm. While the focus is on snow vs. no snow this storm (regardless of snow or not) could be very impactful. You have high wind potential so there will be risk for power outages and given the degree of cold behind the storm (for at least a few days anyway) that could be bad news for some then you have the risk for what could be rather devastating coastal flooding if those cards play out.

Your point was a great point and is something that provided a good deal of value to discussion. People interpret how they want

May end up even seeing a tropopause fold with this.

I had it a few weeks back. Started feeling sick late Wednesday afternoon on the 29th (I had just scheduled my booster the day before or earlier that morning too). My nose started running like nothing I've ever had. Mucus would just randomly gush out of my nose with no warning. My friend was able to schedule me for a test that Friday and it came back positive. Thankfully the symptoms were fairly mild (comparable to that after the second shot). Only symptoms that were worse were fatigue and body aches. I started to feel much better by Saturday afternoon and symptoms were gone by like Tuesday of last week. However, around last Tuesday I developed this cough that won't go away. The fatigue is still there too...randomly get super tired during the middle of the day.

10:1 maps were garbage last storm b/c ratios were obviously going to be much higher and 10:1 maps are going to be garbage this storm b/c ratios probably going to be less than 10:1 (except maybe the farther north you go). Too worry to really worry about ratios but something to start considering soon.

Certainly a plausible scenario at this stage.

Actually taking the GFS verbatim for the concerns of snow going over to rain...in the GFS scenario we may actually dry slot before any transition to rain can happen lol. With H7 tracking that far west and as developed as it is there would certainly be a mean dry slot.

I can agree that ensembles may be rather useless in this sense. Maybe this sort of logic can be applied to every storm but in the sense of this event ensemble means and individuals and their outputs really aren't going to tell us something we can't figure out on our own. Each solution/output is essentially tied into the evolution of the upper-levels. You can have 48/48 (whatever the number is) ensembles all show a track through the Hudson Valley...now something like that may yield extremely high confidence in such a scenario unfolding but that probably wouldn't be the case here. That is essentially tied into how the model is evolving the upper-levels. The next set of ensembles could go in the entirely opposite direction if the evolution is handled differently. All in all IMO ensembles really aren't going to tell us something we can't figure out by applying science/meteorology

The NAO is trending negative as this is unfolding which is I believe what you typically want to see...but this goes to show there is much more to snow/cold than just the NAO. It actually even looks like we have a pseudo 50/50 low which usually is a good thing as well (but might actually also be enhancing the ridging). The big problem is the system becomes so amped and does so too early and we develop strong upstream ridging. With the core of the ridging across northern New England this acts as a block in a sense and the storm goes west

Comparing between two different sources so resolution could be a factor but through at least 114 there don't seem to be major differences at H5 between the GFS/Euro...they actually appear to be pretty damn similar...not just with the southern s/w but the one digging in the northern stream too

You can't totally just use SLP as a means to justify this but the difference really lies within H5. The potential was actually there on the 6z run from Jan 10 but certainly it wasn't anything screaming noteworthy. The difference really comes down to how the initial wave of energy was being handled as it moved into the U.S. The GFS initially had this energy going from the upper-Midwest across the Ohio Valley into the Northeast. Since then the GFS has been much more bullish of driving this s/w through the Missouri Valley into the Tennessee Valley. I wouldn't use this as an example or a means to say the GFS sucks...this just goes to show how complex the pattern is and how even subtle changes whether it's strength of ridging/troughing how each of these features evolve, and what happens to s/w energy during these evolutions. At this point the s/w of interest was probably over who the hell knows.

At this juncture it's almost worthless or even pointless as to what the SLP tracks are. Until there is a much better handle of the upper-levels and the evolution of key features we essentially know what kind of look is going to yield farther west solutions and what kind of look is going to yield farther east solutions. But with this said I think we should actually have a very good idea of what will transpire probably with the 12z runs Friday or certainly with the 0z guidance. At this point not only the sampling of the energy will be there but how the energy is evolving as its digging into the Tennessee Valley will be known.

Part of the issue too is you're already seeing the jet streak round the base of the trough across Louisiana/Mississippi. If that could hold off until like Alabama/Georgia that would probably vastly increase the likelihood of shifting things (SLP, 850, 700) farther south and east. Guess this falls into the category of becoming too amped too early?

This GFS run would have it all. Areas hit hard as snow may end with rain and a line of thunderstorms. With H7 closing off so far west there would be a mean dry slot and probably would see a fine line of convection form right along the dry slot given the dynamics and steep lapse rates. Obviously too early for these sort of details but this solution would give it all.

The coastal flooding could be pretty wild with this.

MDT with moderate snow with light snow falling throughout PA. A bit encouraging but seeing some of the mesos look the way they do right now...we've seen this story before (focusing specifically on CT here).

hmmm NAM actually seems to have a great deal of subsidence over Connecticut. Makes sense subsidence could occur somewhere given the intensity of the banding which will be involved.

The current radar presentation doesn't seem bad at all and actually looks promising. There's a ton of juice available with this. Most model guidance really had this dissipating a bit as it moved across the mountains but that hasn't been the case. Some pretty impressive snow totals too out of WV/KY/TN. 0z too doesn't seem awful

A bit more robust than the 12z run!!

WOW HTS closed until 9:00 tomorrow morning. Guessing that's related to the snow (or at least factoring in). They're getting hit pretty hard. Visibility there down to <0.25 miles at times