weatherwiz

I'm pissed at myself for going 5-8" for such a large area but I was unsure how to really translate all the concerns into map form lol. The swaths of highest totals ended up being where I was thinking and there was pretty good support for that. This is why sometimes QPF is one of the last things I'll really look at. You start looking at QPF output right away and the beer goggles go on. I mean you can get a general sense of what QPF will be like anyways assessing everything. I am glad though I didn't go bonkers with those amped solutions starting arising in the typical 72ish hour time frame.

It does look beautiful outside, everything caked in snow with blue skies. This makes winter and frigid temperatures more enjoyable and tolerable.

Have to give some kudos to the NAM here. I don’t understand why everyone is always so hot and heavy to just toss it, especially when it doesn’t show a solution that is unwanted. It did a phenomenal job hitting at that northwestern band, kind of crap in between and then heavier banding for northeast areas. The whole process leading up to this storm and then the nowcasting period shows exactly there is more to just forecasting snow based off of QPF and figuring out snow ratio and it goes to show that QPF can’t just be taken at face value. A lot of wheels should be spinning in one’s head when assessing QPF. From a forecasting perspective though, a lot of how this storm played out went exactly how several mentioned. There were concerns about snow growth, rates, and ratios outside of the banding and that would heavily influence totals. The challenge is, how the heck do you portray that on a snow map? You really can’t…probably best to just be as cautious as possible with the totals and mention localized higher amounts.

Kind of difficult to get a good reading with the wind but seems about or around 4”. Will wait for final regional snow totals but going to be a good ole D on the forecast

In a dead zone right now

hopefully some of those totals in NJ are a good omen but also going to need this to consolidate some over CT...good banding signal but its very streaky

Radar seems to be filling in across southwest Connecticut

Looking good out your way with the band. Not very far outside those heavier echos but wind is so gusty its probably blowing snow from that band here

This band is going to ramp up over the next few hours. mlvl fronto continues increasing. Northeast CT into Northeast MA is going to get hit good...band really cranks by then as sfc low deepens as it lifts northeast

That's exactly how my brother texted too. Said he saw a flash of lightning and then a huge bang of thunder. He's like equal distance from Plainville/Farmington lines give or take

You're probably not wrong

We've waited all winter for this. It's rock and roll time

Brother in New Britain just reported thunder/lightning

The lightning also may not be C2G so not being picked up or displayed?

I'm getting more optimistic too you may see the band strengthen some as it crosses CT. I was thinking today the lower end of my 5-8" was going to be the case but starting to think there could be lots of 7-8''.

Steep mlvl lapse rates. I bet there is a good MAUL on some HRRR soundings. I know models were hinting at that

Let's go!!

Mesosyanlsys is encouraging in that regard. Has me cautiously optimistic good banding gets much of the region.

Been a growing concern of mine the last day. It will be fun and wild for a time under the band but outside the band snowgrowth and ratios will be very questionable.

Parts of the deep South will end up with more than a good chunk of us may Was looking at LFT on bufkit...pretty wild for down there.

My girlfriend had mentioned it to me a while back but I thought she was exaggerating a bit...but then recently (like a few months ago) there was a news story (may have been local Springfield station) on it and the Wal Mart here was like somewhere between #5-10 in the country...I want to say it was 5th lol.

This is pretty interesting, however, I think it shows the significance of a band materializing and being under the band today. I'm becoming more and more convinced that outside of the banding...spots may struggle to get much past 3-4"...and this could end up being generous. Anyways, when I was looking at 12z NAM bufkit I was a little shocked. Based on 12z NAM bufkit, it looked like the heaviest banding would impact BOS-BDL and probably just west of ORH. But when assessing the model I would have thought the banding signal was better northwest of this line...unfortunately not much for bufkit profiles (CAN in northwest CT but it didn't look as impressive there). Here is a snip it of BOS/BDL. The window for accumulation is small and heavily tied into the banding.

Unfortunately I have a busy day ahead so my window to do that closed. Wal Mart is probably a disaster (and the Wal Mart here is always a disaster on a normal day...it's actually ranked as like one of the top 5 or 10 most violent in the country lol) and I'm sure everyone is at Big Y grabbing bread and milk.

Driveway here is still glazed and roads have a glazed look. I wanted to hit up Wal Mart/Big Y but I don't want to deal with any ice potential...not just myself but people drive like idiots. I'll just stay put.

Can see that setting up on mesoanalysis