I know I've been enjoying it and posting happily, but it also hasn't been "epic". I'm with J.Spin on that one. It's just been a good period of winter, which this year feels a bit better. I mean we are talking about mountains and places that can do 36" of upslope in 36 hours... or the 80" in a week type cycles. 36" in 7 days at my High Road plot is fun but it's not anything overly noteworthy except for when it doesn't snow in years like this. I mean, that had 106" in 3 weeks back in 2017... like that's an epic or noteworthy period, ha. But this season has tended to want to spread the love to the lower elevations more too. The elevation gradient hasn't been as severe as it can be.
We got a fun week of snow in an overall slow season... I think of 2015-16 and a poor winter when SNE ripped off a couple good storms. I remember one with 15" of paste in CT among others while NNE starved. Also, orographic snows will always be sharp with a gradient depending on the set-up, Froude number, amount of blocked flow. This one was a bit more unblocked and favored slightly further east in the upslope zone and spread the love out more. Other times it will be a big blocked flow period and the west side of the upslope zone will get destroyed while the eastern ends will see wind-blown flurries for days and days.
The OTG difference was the initial storm, IMO. If that tracks west (like mreaves alluded to), and that initial 6-16" disappears as rain, then this whole thing is just a serviceable upslope period with a few inches per day.