powderfreak

True, good point.

Condescend this lol. It’s all good Ginxy, I respect your opinion. I just think we have too much info now and it skews our perception.

We benefited from it for sure. Say you see 12z and a storm is tracking in location X…. then we have to wait until 00z and its only 30 miles north… it seems like it’s making small movements. What we didn’t see was 18z that was 50 miles south… then 80 miles north 6 hours later…now we see an intermediary run and think the model is all over the place.

All a model needs to do is nail a few winter events from 4 days out and it’s enshrined. I also think the other models were worse or seemed worse, and they’ve caught up. Running the Euro 4 times a day hasn’t helped. We see twice as many solutions as we used to back then with the model. The flip side is I can think of numerous events it was way too generous with QPF in snowfalls on the western and northern side. What was that event where it was gung ho on 20-36” for NYC and even into NNE for days… only to get completely shafted… 2011? Or Feb 2013?

There are a lot of candidates for posts of the year.

Not to mention we’d remember the 6 days out of 365 days in a calendar year when the Euro showed more snow than other models and it was right. But no one cared when its QPF forecast missed in early June. A lot of cherry picking in memories rooted around snowfall events.

We could work with that.

Stowe didn’t open till 12/3 last year, so absolutely. Pretty busy this weekend! And yeah, I undersold this one too lol. Models weren’t really exciting south of Jay but I was surprised it got as far south as Mansfield. Crazy sharp drop off south of here though.

Pretty big change from 00z. We watch.

Good stuff today. Patrol opened the Front back up. Photo from a friend.

9" measured on elevated surfaces within 24 hours is a solid snowfall (1-1.5" before the flip). Closing in on a half inch per hour average over an entire calendar day. That's a good shot of snow for the northern Greens as the trough moves through.

That makes total sense too... probably a tenth of an inch of liquid or so ahead of Mansfield. With these good ratios, 2-3" storm total increase makes sense. Say a 9" vs 12" event. This was 5pm at 1,500ft.

Agreed. The default is certainly more progressive... it has to work to amplify, like all systems do. It's why we know the Messenger ticks are a thing. It's probably a more SNE/CNE event rather than NNE.

Still cranking away. Storm total is what's on the stack plus 1-1.5" that was there between 5-6am before the board flipped. The base area probably is only an inch behind or so.

Blizzard conditions at times this evening.

Ha it was in jest as a joke. Personally, I want it over like metro-west of BOS, lol. I feel like it’s my duty as a white walker north of the wall for a comment here and there… but in reality it is nice to see enthusiasm and hope again on the forum. It feels a bit like the old days on here for the past 48 hours or so.

That’s one helluva band right through ALB airport area.

Ugh.

Yup, it was 3” in 24 when I posted that. Two hours later it’s 5”. Really not much difference between 1,500ft and 3,000+ feet. 1” last night and 4” since 6am.

4” overnight plus today up there? Must be a sweet powder day. Its been snowing for a couple hours (1”/hr) and about 2” new today after 1” overnight. This is accumulations since about 9-10am in the base area.

It must be, only does it during standard time. Unlikely to show feet of snow during daylight savings time.

I couldn’t resist . It was either that or post something about how that run is suppressed. I’ll go back to watching from a distance and come back on Sunday when it starts to unravel again.

Meh, need more amp than that.

We just don’t know. Could be lower.

180 hours out. Unlikely as modeled but the chances will be there as the seasonal baroclinic zone sags south in the means.