Jump to content

CoastalWx

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    160,894
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CoastalWx

  1. I just got home after being out of work for 4 hrs. I don't see anything glaring, but I also haven't looked too hard.
  2. I would slow the suicides on the hi res stuff. Non hydrostatic models may be too QG theory based. IOW, they might be trying to put low pressure near convection like a TC. Sometimes they are right, but not sure here.
  3. I don't think that is the same feature Pickles. Tough to tell. maybe.
  4. GFS loves the I-95 screwjie lol. I have no idea..maybe convection processes is causing meso models to tuck lows to the east. Sometimes it's right, sometimes not.
  5. Euro could be a bit too wet. It's done that before. Not saying this is the case, but just keep in mind.
  6. It's also important not to react to every model run. What may look great now could change a bit at 00z too.
  7. Yeah you too. It should get to you and then orient itself N-S and then rot. That's my guess.
  8. Still a little disconcerting to see model differences like this. I think Kev-Will_ray still get into the def band for a time.
  9. Scott, I think maybe at worst snow gets wet at like 32-33. Just my gut. Euro is awfully wet in terms of QPF and it sometimes is a little too wet, but it has the idea I think.
  10. I doubt it beats Jan 2005. Actually gets to 32 where you are.
  11. Man some awesome low level enhancement. Flurries into Wed morning.
  12. I really feel like cstl SE MA just away from any CF is going to have stupid totals.
  13. If anything, snowfall west of HYA may be not high enough IMO.
  14. It doesn't. It depends on the situation. Many of our previous storms had the band east, it's just your perception.
  15. You can certainly see the nice sub zone on the GFS in the velocity fields.
×
×
  • Create New...