Jump to content

Burghblizz

Members
  • Posts

    1,432
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Burghblizz

  1. Just now, Bubbler86 said:

    Yea, just to clarify, although one user said the Nam nailed it, I think the general thought was that the Nam foretold that the low may go further west than some suites had it and that it would not be a pure snow event for much of the west like other models alluded to as well.  So many people think the Nam is garbage that it leads to Nam apologists (like me) coming out in droves when it was not all bunk. 

    It definitely was an important part of framing up the final result. 

    • Like 1
  2. 7 minutes ago, TheClimateChanger said:

    The snow map shows a report of 7" as of 7 am at the NWS office at 1 N CARNOT-MOON. I believe that's where the official snow records are observed, not at the airport. Given the continued light snow over the past two hours, would have to think they are up to 7.5" or so by now.

    It’s Shafer Road in Moon - which is like a mile from the airport. So it essentially mirrors what you would see there.

    • Like 1
  3. The NAM was good with showing that there were going to be P type issues even north and west - but I’m not sure I give it too much credit because a wide spread Western/west central PA ice storm really didn’t materialize. Just a lot of mixing and flipping.

    Most areas around Pittsburgh look to be finishing 7” to 10” once this morning tapers off. The real prolific stuff got shunted a little more west, as the WV panhandle and extreme western PA should pop some 12” totals. 

  4. The radar pivot and banding last night was awesome. I can’t see that .47” at the airport being accurate, but I don’t think a 2” hour was out of the question. I caught more the tail of that same band and it was rippin.

    A line from Weirton to Beaver falls will break a foot. That area did better with avoiding a prolong dry slot before everything pivoted. Most of the rest of us got caught up in it a little too long. Still a beautiful morning 

    • Like 1
  5. Yinz are going to drive yourselves nuts clicking on hourly increments of hourly models for the 8 hours, and checking where the pretty colors line up. 

    I think E to W across central AGC will be the difference between 8 and 12 because of dry slot duration. And N to S along that axis will add or subtract ~2” from that range.

    Beaver /Lawrence/Butler certainly have a shot to pop a 15” total. 

    • Like 1
  6. Not sure how Tolleris is resolving the fact that the NW edge outside his sleet line is where the totals should ramp up - yet that’s where he has the totals drop off. Probably the single most important issue in terms of where big totals wind up.

    He tries to forecast for a wide area, and doesn’t put diligence into those areas. 

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...