Jump to content

Burghblizz

Members
  • Posts

    1,432
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Burghblizz

  1. 1 minute ago, Rd9108 said:

    Yep ill take that. I love moderate/heavy snow. That's why in my opinion ill take a 1994 storm over 2010 any day. Of course I'd love to see a 1993 storm since I was 2 when that hit but that's a once in a lifetime storm. 

    2010 didn’t quite have the extreme ‘93 and 94 rates (3-4” hour), but it have some have prolonged really good rates. I remember getting like 8” in 5 hours from 7 to midnight. And then there was another period from like 3 to 6 AM where we tacked on another 5”

  2. 18 minutes ago, KPITSnow said:

    Hey I want to be clear...everything after December is gravy. I’m not complaining, just pointing out concerns in the evolution of the system.

    All good! I know you weren’t really tracking this one the whole time, but this is the way it’s been really the last few days. It’s always been kind of a long duration, moderate event, with this outside shot of scoring big. 

    • Like 1
  3. 1 hour ago, dj3 said:

    Yea it’s going to be a different storm than what we’re used to for sure. Just had on Kdka and they mentioned 1-2” per hr rates later this afternoon so we’ll see. 

    She was saying that on Twitter too.

    We’ll see if it materializes. We didn’t come out guns blazing this time, but still will be interesting. 

    About an inch or so in Monroeville. Relatively windy with this current burst

  4. 10 minutes ago, KPITSnow said:

    Again, very important to note here that this literally does fall over almost two days. 

    This is not news. It’s always been trying to get a nice front end, and then see how the coastal develops over the second 24-36 hour period. This version of the NAM didn’t produce the way some others have. 

    The other thing we have been watching is the heaviest intial band slipping a bit south. This NAM shows that a bit too.

  5. 13 minutes ago, MAG5035 said:

    Well here we go, I'm kicking this off now so we can have some of our last minute model guidance discussion organized together with an overall storm thread. Plus we're about 12 hrs from this getting into the region. Western PA folks are welcome too if they want to share their obs/discussion. 

    Current Obs: Clearish, 32ºF. Snowboard deployed

    We’ll let yinz know how this front end is looking 

    • Like 2
  6. 1 minute ago, jwilson said:

    Sorry, I'll show it a little better here.

    E0YIW2y.png

    That 700H "jet" almost orients itself right toward our area.  Very close.  Next frame is more important to see how it evolves.

     

    rx6WRJ1.png

    If we could get that motion to orient more W-E instead of NE-SW, we'd hit those better rates.

     

    k22TNzj.png

    We miss the ideal frontogenesis and convection, but just barely.  A strong enough easterly fetch could get us those bigger totals.  However, like I said, I don't want to rely on the placement of this feature, and the CMC is by far the most intense with it, overall.  I'd rather get more of our precip from the first round with the primary and hope for bonus snows after the coastal cranks.

    Great analysis 

  7. 3 hours ago, Rd9108 said:

    HKEt4Og.png

    Euro looking close to that same 8-9” type output in the city or just south - but instead of the snow hole over Morgantown, it has a 12” bullseye. And the totals trail off from the city north. 

    This really shows some of the complexity with track, temps, and the dry slot (which could hurt those borderline temps, in addition to less precip. So double whammy where that happens). 

    I think Euro overall is a slightly better look for us since the dry slot seems to be in central WV. So more wiggle room as long as that shear to the NE doesn’t get us

     

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...