Jump to content

psuhoffman

Members
  • Posts

    26,471
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by psuhoffman

  1. Yes. There isn’t that much difference between 1994 and 2014 and 2015 honestly. There was another shorter comp period in Feb 1993 also. Slight changes in the centering of the features lead to different results. 1994 the trough centered further west which is why it lead to more ice v snow. Even though even up here none of the storms were pure snow I’d love to repeat that. According to local coop data it was a string of 3-6” mix events that built a glacier. I remember that winter visiting my cousins in Harper’s ferry WV and they had a solid glacier on the ground all winter! Fairfax ended up slightly too far south and unfortunate most storms were pure freezing rain. 1993 was similar. 70 north got crushed and it was less favorable further south. again a further west trough axis. But it was really close. For now I like the axis of the features better, more like 2014 2015. But that’s something to watch out for. If the cold gets centered too far west it opens up the dreaded SER issue.
  2. On that run we only briefly lose the surface and most of the heavy precip is gone by then. It’s a 4-8” thump snow to ice to a few hours of drizzle before the cold air freezes everything solid. Old school we got those things more often. And they were great.
  3. How did we all miss that. We should have a thread about this.
  4. .5-.8 qpf falls south to north before we lose the mid levels on that scenario.
  5. You’ve been handling it so well. I couldn’t tell.
  6. It’s perfect. Duel waves. The first lays down 2-4” across the NW parts of the forum and the second flush hits 95 and between the two the whole area gets 6”+
  7. Not true we got a 1-3” snow in early January but you dismissed that. Dude it’s ok. I’m not picking on you. You be you. But you gotta admit looking back it was kinda funny to go on a rant about needing snow 3 weeks after we got a hecs for Xmas and while all the models were already showing the next epic pattern developing.
  8. We probably want the same things. I’m just sometimes a little more rational about it.
  9. He complained in between snowpacalyps and snowmageddon in 2010 because we went a whole month without a HECS if you can believe that injustice.
  10. And in fairness Ji wants everyday to be a weather disaster so…
  11. I'm pretty familiar with LWX, CTP,PHI, ALY, BTV, GYX, BOU, RIW, SLC and ABQ, rarely read anything from the others.
  12. The thermal boundary is oriented and located almost exactly where I would want it for this type of pattern to work. Have to see if that ends up being the reality but I have no issue with the current projections.
  13. EPS looks good for the period of Jan 20-25 but not focused on any one wave...there is a bit of an uptick around the 21st compared to the rest of the period. But it favors some wave sliding by under us during that window.
  14. EPS is similar...the wave around the 19-20th is iffy, after that any follow up waves in the next week would favor snow given the trough axis and thermal boundary.
  15. On the GEFS the wave around the 19-20 is the most iffy wrt thermals, but the GEFS would indicate we would likely be on the snowy side of any waves in the week after that. EPS details still rolling in
×
×
  • Create New...