psuhoffman

The primary comes across too far north. It’s that way across all guidance. Unless that changes (it could) it’s inevitably a miller b screw job. We could eeek out some snow but it’s the setup where we watch north of us cash in. However, a bombing system the 28 helps the setup after.

When 2016 showed up at day 10 it was rain on the euro also. Same reason...marginal airmass. We are getting closer to the part of climo where marginal air masses should work with a good track.

Been a nice week up here...barely lost any snow all week. Some shots from Friday and today From my walk Friday my jebwalk with my 2 year old this evening (at her insistence)

If it obliterates my healthy snowpack only to replace it with a fraction that’s not exactly a win. I’d rather simply avoid the 12 hour torch and keep my current snow lol. But for those not with snow OTG I can see the excitement.

I think he over reacted to 2 VERY good euro op runs yesterday and one EPS where it took a big move in that direction. He was probably expecting the EPS to continue trending and the op not to take a crap the next run (although I would argue it’s a great setup day 10 for something early next year). I think he jumped the gun and got emotional maybe but there was logic behind his thoughts. Even with some degradation today the look is close to a big storm look.

Euro doesn’t dive enough energy far enough south to do much for out Xmas wave idea. Just some flurries after the front unless you’re in the extreme NW parts of the region.

That’s the H5 from the end of January 2000.

Wrt my h5 post from 2000 above one key to getting that to work is the extension of the east based NAO ridge west into the Hudson Bay region.

It’s not our most typical look but it’s worked before

My bad

My bigger worry for the post Xmas threat is a miller b screw job not cutter. I’m talking about the Dec 28 period. Anything after that is way too far out to worry about.

Not surprisingly Imo. That disconnect between the mid levels and the surface while limiting big totals on the southern area also created a HUGE expense of significant snow. The initial WAA fgen snowfall band set up for a time where you would expect with that surface track. But the mid levels ended up driving the forcing WAY further NW then typical.

I think we might be differing based on perspective of location. I was analyzing based on 95 but that’s different from the eastern shore in coastal synoptic events. We did have a -NAO and a 50:50. The NAO wasn’t perfectly centered but how often is it? The high was still located near Montreal as the storm turned the corner in SC. To me that’s not a problem. The surface track ended up fine. That crazy up the bay track didn’t verify. It tracked east of VA beach then NNE to just off cape may. Of course that’s inside of where you want it but honestly you need a completely different look then west of the bay. You either need a progressive wave look or in the case of an amplified coastal setup a damn near PERFECT setup to score. With a coastal track a 3-6” to mix event in DC is mostly rain for you. But 95 has had warning events with the track that verified before. A slightly colder airmass and they would have this time. Or a slightly better mid level phased system. I can’t stress enough how anomalous that disconnect between the surface and mid levels was. It is NOT common to get 30-40” along the PA NY border from a surface system that tracks outside VA beach and Cape May. Their perfect track would be tucked up the Chesapeake Bay! There is a reason those areas don’t typically get 20”+ snowstorms. They are usually too far inland to benefit much from coastals. Or had that exact setup been in Jan/Feb with cooler SST even with the disconnect I doubt we see as fast a warm surge. With that mid level track we were never getting a HECS but could have had a warning level mix event into 95. But like I said...for the eastern shore not so much. It’s super difficult there. So much has to go exactly perfect that I get where you’re coming from.

Imo global operationals have become really amazing at giving a generally accurate (so long as you don’t expect dead on balls accurate details) look at synoptic setups once inside about 150 hours or so. Longer leads in some incredibly stable blocking patterns and less in volition ones but in general once inside 150 you get a decent idea what the general look will be. That’s an amazing thing considering day 6 used to be a complete crapshoot not long ago. But past 150 they go haywire fast. Chaos and exponential errors start to take over. So imo what’s more important then looking at the op output past 150 is to look at the general H5 pattern at about day 5/6 then extrapolate where that SHOULD go based on history. That is where the “woofs” are coming from. The look day 5/6 has a LOT of potential regardless of how any one op run handles the details after.

Holy....I’ve never seen the PV that obliterated.

One last point regarding super long range. For 3 weeks now guidance suddenly shifts to a central pac Nina ridge look after week 3. But the generally weak AO continues. But that pac look continues to get kicked in time as the WPO vortex persists. I think the guidance may be keying on the enso SST and missing the north pac pattern suppressing the Nina ridge. I think that north pac pattern may be a result of the very odd (for a Nina) warm waters to the north of the enso regions. We’ve seen this game before where guidance wants to shift the look to a classic enso response week 3+ but it never happens. The last two years were a classic example of this when the weak ninos were offset by other factors. It’s possible we are seeing the same but in out favor this time. Either way even if the pac goes to hell if we keep a -NAM state we could still get periods of opportunity unlike last year.

5 days ago the GFS had a cutter with rain to Canada today. Instead there is a weak wave squashed to our southeast. Just pointing that out. Might be relevant.

I agree to an extent but like every setup it’s a matter of degrees. Problem is in DEC with warm SST even for Dec you need almost a perfect setup. You are right it wasn’t the PERFECT setup for a DC BIG snow and I never had DC pegged as the epicenter of that storm. I think 3-6 was my original thought from 72 hours. But at that time guidance had a better mid level pass/close and wasn’t picking up on that crazy mid level warm layer. The actual track was ok for a messy but significant snow. We get caught in the HECS look but most of DC snows aren’t HECS. That look was fine for a 3-6” to ice event in DC had other details gone better. A better mid level track or earlier phase and DC provably gets a few more inches before that warm layer blasts in...and maybe more on the back as a less westward intrusion takes less time to recover. So if the point is that look was not ideal for a HECS I totally agree. But it was a look that has lead to plenty of good solid snows in and around DC just not HECS level. If we can somehow avoid the spike to 50 dews on Thursday we could hold our pack. It’s like 8” of solid you can stand on it concrete with like 1.5 qpf content here. It won’t melt easy if we can avoid a complete torch somehow.

One reason the GFS is cutting the wave around New Years is how it’s handling the Xmas-28 period. Frankly all 3 globals have a different evolution but the other 2 end up with a massive 50/50 that sets up the Dec 30 on period. Euro bombs the Xmas system into that vortex then absorbs the Dec 30 wave to amplify it even more. CMC is weaker with Xmas wave and develops a weaker vortex but then amplifies the dec 28 wave and they phase into a monster vortex. End result is the cmc and euro have a massive vortex to our northeast to suppress the flow. Gfs is weaker with both waves and so does not. This is everything. to be clear “blocking” is a means to an end not the end. The actual effect of blocking that directly leads to our threats is the 50/50 feature. Blocking is important because ridging around the NAO domain forces systems to track and get stuck in the 50/50 region. It’s that feature, though, that sets up the confluence and suppressed flow across the eastern US that we need. If you look at all our big storms almost all had a NAO block. But the few exceptions had a well timed 50/50! As for the AO v NAO debate...it depends. The AO being - encourages a more expensive jet into the Conus and cold. Depending on other factors it can also promote some 50/50 assistance but not as effective as the NAO. If we have a cooperative PNA AO combo that works just fine. If there is a progressive pattern with open waves the AO can do just fine. Get the cold pressed south and let waves attack. Some of the 2014 systems worked that way. We did have a -AO just not a -NAO at times that winter. Those kinds of waves can work without a blocked up pattern. But if you want a big dog HECS storm you want the NAO/50/50 combo. That combo can also bully the whole pattern and compensate for warts in other places. so in conclusion Imo BIG snows are most correlated to the NAO/50/0 and just snow in general (be it 1” or 6”) is most correlated to the AO.

Para gfs is close on the 28.

The first storm after Xmas (the only one in range of worrying about yet) doesn’t cut. It gets shredded them redevelops as a miller b that misses us. Problem is the NS wave runs out ahead of the SS and gets shredded but it also flattens the heights and squashes the SS until it phases and comes together too late. We need the SS out in front so the NS can phase in to our south. Look at the h5 for most of our big snows (it’s on the climo thread) there is a trough near AK usually.

There used to be a great discussion archived by Gary Gray on all the models each day that week. The Euro was closest to reality but it’s kind of a myth that it nailed it. From his discussion it seemed the euro most of the week was further north and did get more snow then the American guidance into our area but it was by no means close to reality. I think NWS was splitting the difference with a 3-6” forecast between the American guidance that had barely anything in DC and the euro that showed like 6-10”. It did but it also trended weaker and strung out. A lobe of the tpv rotated on top of it and squashed the system. From 72 hours it looked like a 20” snowstorm in PA and it ended up a 4-8” snow in VA. It wasn’t really last minute though. The shift happened around 48 hours. I was up in PA that year and by the last 36 hours knew we were screwed.

Happy Anniversary @mappy

How do you hyperlink pictures? I used to use imgur but it stopped working.

Euro tries to cut a storm day 9 and block days nope. Forces a transfer from the Great Lakes to off SC lol.