psuhoffman

It’s actually more amplified but has a wider spread of solutions so less concentrated snow mean

Got to love ya. Only you would look past a cold pattern that hasn’t even started yet to the next possible torch.

I don’t think we get a 12”+ event. That’s asking a lot in a Nina even in a good pattern. But I think there is a “decent” chance we can pull off a more widespread 6-10 type storm. I think there is a good chance we can get a 3-6 type deal or some combo of multiple events in those ranges.

New England thinks of us the way we think of NC

For the whole period or this one threat?

Also 99, 2001, and 2018 had MECSs for MD north of 70. 2009 had one SE of 95. 2013 had one for interior VA. 2009, 2017 and 2018 had one for the beaches and 2022 had one just south of DC. 6-12” storms are common in our area in a Nina when it’s a cold enough pattern. But the 20”+ ones are very very rare.

Euro has this weird north south duel low structure. If the northern low is the actual low or would be a better hit. I kinda doubt it looks like that.

The best h5 look for a major amplification on the east coast is actually around Feb 28 on the GEFS, pacific is perfect there to promote a wave to really dig into the east and the flow is relaxed enough to let it bomb out.

2/11: 2.4" Season 21.1"

Bob definitely was the first to go big in 96 but to be fair he was only like 15 mins ahead of everyone else...its just he was on the air as the evening guidance came in, back then the ETA and NGM started coming in around 11pm, and I guess that was the run where the models caved and came north...and he broke in before his normal weather timeslot to tell everyone a huge snow was coming, top 5 ever. They didn't have the normal graphics and forecast prepared it was all just on the spot based on what he just saw. Everyone else caught on very soon after. But what made that moment so memorable was that Bob Ryan was by far the most conservative and almost always under predicted snow, so him saying that made it all the more memorable.

It was right up here!

what makes me better than everyone else is how humble I am

Do you mean Feb 2014? We had a lot of minor snows Feb 2015 but no amplified waves most were over running in the epo pattern. The biggest snow we had that month was that cutter that somehow produced 4-8” because it was so cold the day before. I see some similarities to the Feb 2014 storm.

The WAA and associated surface wave runs out ahead of the upper support then a second wave develops with the mid and upper levels. It’s not the most common but I’ve seen it. A March 99 storm I remember having a similar progression. Feb 2014 kinda did that also to some extent.

There was room for that storm to trend west on the Icon looking at the h5. It was more an issue of a weak POS wave than being blocked on this run. It also might have been about to bomb and turn up looking at the flow. There was more ridging. Just needed the upper low to turn negative quicker.

I’d prefer it showed some amped up monster even if it was rain. Not because of any seasonal trend. Because of THIS setup. With this setup even if the storm was over amped we would get a good snow/ice event before any flip to rain. Those runs 2 days ago were about the worst it could get in terms of too amped. That’s the advantage of this kind of blocking. Even a cutter gets turned east and secondaries and you get a thump snow at the least. The total fail option is a weak wave that gets suppressed to our south. So while I’m not worried yet this is the opposite of what is prefer to see right now.

Care to share? lol

EPS 5 day mean. Captures both waves

About 150 hours we want it to be near us... that's about when guidance has started to get a solution at least close in a general sense to the final outcome...so we have another 6 runs or so where I am ok with it being whevever as long as its somewhat close...but once the storm is inside 150 we want the jack to be really close to us...doesn't have to be right over but not way down near NC.

GFS with Norfolk's biggest snowstorm ever lol

was gonna be real close...the trough was amplifying and going negative real quick at the end...and the vortex was moving off...but would it capture and tuck it in time? It was gonna be a close call for an absolute monster if it did.

The fringe is real

1.2" here

When I did my snowfall climo study for BWI there was absolutely no correlation between snowstorms and the EPO. I wonder if I did the same study for the DELMARVA....I bet there might be a different result. @CAPE are there any reliable snowfall reporting stations over there I could use?