Jump to content

SnowDreamer

Members
  • Posts

    436
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SnowDreamer

  1. 8 minutes ago, snowmagnet said:

    Just got a WAA for Fairfax for 2-4”. It seems to be too conservative based on the latest information.  Is that because they depend on the NAM?

    It's conservative, but not an unfair play if you're willing to upgrade to warnings in 4 hours. 

  2. 2 minutes ago, CAPE said:

    Looks reasonable to me considering the antecedent conditions and the progressive nature of the pattern. You really buy those pretty WB clown maps?

    I agree, I’m not as optimistic about the 7-10” region but the rest looks exactly like mine. Hoping to lock in that look at 18Z

  3. 2 minutes ago, CAPE said:

    The 18z Euro will shift the precip a bit further SE, with snow tv for my yard and an inch or 2 for the DE/MD beaches. Just a guess, or call it intuition. 

    18z euro will shift NW enough to get .5” into DC, and keep us all on the hook before it and all others fold to NAM by 06z tomorrow. (Reverse logic!)

    • Haha 4
  4. 15 minutes ago, SomeguyfromTakomaPark said:

    Totally unrelated to the current drama but I did a marathon yesterday.  As some of you know I lost my wife last summer and now I’m a single parent of two small kids.  Running has been the thing that keeps me sane.  There were no real races to do so I just did my own marathon at east Potomac park. I did it totally unsupported and used my car as the aid station. I’ve never done a race before but this was really fun!  I want to do a real one now!

    That’s amazing! Running can be so therapeutic.
     

    I’m sorry for your loss. I used to run every evening when I was struggling with my own happiness, and I still make a point of putting in laps on hard days. Exercise is just great for the brain, but I also think it feels good to know you got something concrete done. 

  5. 29 minutes ago, Wetbulbs88 said:

    I disagree. First of all, very pedantic scrutiny of the word area. By area, I meant our area. Not sure how you derived otherwise, or how that's relevant.

    Secondly, the 0z NAM last night was by far the most accurate solution. The pros specifically singled it out. If you took the snow maps verbatim that's on you. But the mix line and soundings were damn near right. 

    I love that you clarified your diction by not contributing any new information whatsoever. Very helpful. In case it helps you, when I said area, I meant our geographic area of VA, MD, WV. If that's not what you meant, then I can't help you. If, on the other hand, you meant the geographic area like I did, then I'd hope you'd agree that a model's performance in our area is vastly more relevant than other areas where you might be able to point to relative success. 

    I will direct you to the disco this morning which pointed out that although the NAM was close with the warm nose, it too underestimated it. Also, I'd like to point out that the NAMs busted in large part due to QPF overestimation, not because of the mix line. You can see that in the 00Z run which you previously called cherry-picked before you specifically lauded it. 

    • Like 1
  6. 1 minute ago, Wetbulbs88 said:

    So you're cherry picking data points, congrats. 

    The pros at NWS specifically mentioned the NAM's temperature profiles. And many received this QPF, just not our area.

    Try again. 

    Uhm... This is a geographically-based sub-forum. What matters to us is how well a model performs in our area. I'm not especially interested in whether or not the NAM nailed QPF in NYC. I'm not saying the NAM is bad. It's been REALLY good this year, but 3k and 12k both busted. 

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...