Jump to content

HeadInTheClouds

Members
  • Posts

    1,598
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by HeadInTheClouds

  1. 44 minutes ago, weatherpruf said:

    94....came after a decade of crap winters, took everyone by surprise, and no one had snowblowers that still worked...and there were not enough Home Depots around to buy one, and no such thing as online orders....by 96 most of us were ready, but not for something that big....it was back to snowless for a half decade afterwards.

    93-94 was an amazing winter in the mid HV for cold and snow lovers. I just remember it being sold damn cold and it never stopped snowing. I remember battling ice dams on my roof because of the snow and cold. I got as cold as -22 that winter. 

    • Like 1
  2. 3 minutes ago, LibertyBell said:

    10 days to go for the snowless record.

    Per Lee Goldberg the chances are good we get it.

    He also said there were five instances of T at Central Park

     

    4 days actually. I think it's Jan 29th. 

    • Like 1
  3. 1 hour ago, Superstorm93 said:

    New snow or depth? 

    Trying to get a grasp of what this event did up there 

    I'm 10 miles north of Poughkeepsie in Dutchess county and we got maybe a half inch on colder surfaces. A big nothing burger. 

  4. 5 minutes ago, wishcast_hater said:


    I still have snow from Monday.
    Future radar went from snow till around 7 to a big hole in 1 hour. What the hell is going on?


    .

    I have some left also. It looks like we get dry slotted and then when precip picks up again it quickly turns to rain. Still moderate snow here but not much longer. 

  5. 1 hour ago, Winterweatherlover said:

    Ok it was wrong up there, seems right for the nyc metro area, it’s 11:00 am and partly sunny. 

    It's a good model, better than Nam. I'm just saying it's not always right and has some bad moments. 

    • Like 1
  6. 11 minutes ago, Winterweatherlover said:

    It might be overdoing the warmth along the hudson but I'd expect it to be closer to reality than some of these other models. In all the recent storms I can remember it has done very well.  

    Most other models give me (20 miles north of I84) between 1.5 and 3, not unreasonable. Nam does give me close to 4 which is probably too much. 

  7. 1 hour ago, Winterweatherlover said:

    Consistent doesn't always mean correct though. Cmc/Rgem have had their bad moments also. It gives me .5 inch and it has for days. It's wanted nothing to do with a front end dump all the way to Albany. The last time it showed that when other models showed differently it turned out to be correct. 

  8. 20 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

    The RGEM has no front end at all now. Even up in Rockland County. It has it starting as rain. You can’t make this winter up

    It's very unimpressed with the front end snows but we will see if it is right. It has me getting .5 inch up here and every other model has 2-4. 

    • Like 1
  9. 3 minutes ago, Brian5671 said:

    :lol:

    I get on them for cancelling school sometimes but I can kind of understand it with the timing today. It's coming down, expected to continue until mid afternoon, and roads can get slippery and the buses cover a large area. Back in my day I used to walk miles to school in the snow uphill both ways. They just don't make them like they used to. 

×
×
  • Create New...