Jump to content

HeadInTheClouds

Members
  • Posts

    1,685
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by HeadInTheClouds

  1. You really want to play that game? Look at the forecast in your own backyard numbskull.
  2. You should be the one bringing up other people's posts. Pot meet kettle. I could write a novel of your posts that were embarrassingly incorrect. I wrote that because it showed stupid amounts north of 84, like 3 inches for Albany and 1 for Poughkeepsie. It has since corrected to a more reasonable output especially in the Capital District. It is still the warmest of the models and did the storm happen already? We will see what verifies.
  3. and isn't that exactly what happened at 00z vs 18z therefore it looked a little more like other guidance as far as snow vs sleet. I have seen the nam be too aggressive with the warming many times and it did correct somewhat at 00z.
  4. The nam is also known to be too warm at times also. 00z was different, with the primary not being as strong and secondary further south and it was colder. The bottom line is the output was far different from other models, particulary up north, and if Albany gets 3 inches I'll eat my shorts in Macy's window.
  5. Did you look at the 12z and 18z. It was a joke. 00z was a big correction and is still a warm outlier particularly north of 84. At 18z it gave my area 1.5 inches and Albany 3. Every other piece of guidance gives north of 84 up to I90 anywhere between 8 and 12. Should we ignore all the other guidance?
  6. Nam almost made it back to planet earth. It's still hovering though and deciding whether to land or not.
  7. No it didn't. Don't look at TT maps as they include sleet. Pivotal maps had it only giving me about 2 inches and then lots of sleet. It gave Newburgh practically no snow, lol.
  8. What model has actually shifted north besides the nam? GFS basically the same, and RGEM and Euro were colder.
  9. The nam definitely won't verify and I believe we get at least 6 before some sleet.
  10. So has every model quite frankly. We just don't have a go to model anymore. Precip starts in under 36 hours and still a lot of possible solutions on the table as far as the thermals are concerned.
  11. So lets see. 18z Euro gives me 12, 18z RGEM 10, 18z GFS 10, plus other mesos who are a bit out of their range give me similar numbers but I'm supposed to believe that Nam actually has a clue with it's 1.5 IMBY and 3 up in Albany and takes the primary well north and develops the secondary over cape cod. Well, I don't.
  12. It's an absolute warm outlier and not even close to other guidance. It's not just about warm tongues. Nothing is even close.
  13. Those snow numbers look about the same to me. Maybe a tad less but not by much.
  14. It’s still ridiculous with the northern extent of the sleet. I have no problem with the 5 boroughs being mostly sleet but it’s out to lunch further north.
  15. It’s wrong and not even close to any other guidance. Just the nam being the nam.
  16. Yes they do. Your snow is going to fall generally between 6z and 12z. I could see the 3-5 there. Isn’t NWS calling for 4-6?
  17. It also has decent snows in lower Hudson valley in your backyard before the sleet.
×
×
  • Create New...