Jump to content

Henry's Weather

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,728

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Henry's Weather

  1. Henry's Weather
    The SPC seems to not understand severe season in the Northeast. I think 8/10 of these slight risks would have been better designated as marginal
  2. Henry's Weather
    Oh you think so low of me…
  3. Henry's Weather
    True that
  4. Henry's Weather
    Weird to see a Miller A severe threat
  5. Henry's Weather
    Morning convection is a good indicator for afternoon severe? @weatherwiz
  6. Henry's Weather
    This reads like poetry
  7. Henry's Weather
    Seems exceedingly low on 18z given difference from 12 (more positive tilt/suppression on early returns)
  8. Henry's Weather
    Fitbit tells me I burned 6300 calories today by shoveling my house, running through the snow to gf’s house, and shoveling her house. Ah, to be young! (Which I am) Although I seem to lack that sort of energy whenever it isn’t snowing. Thats the mark of a true weenie
  9. Henry's Weather
    4 sigma on a day 6 ensemble run… nuts
  10. Henry's Weather
    Could have been from June 2011?
  11. Henry's Weather
  12. Henry's Weather
    Absolutely ripping in West Concord. LFG
  13. Henry's Weather
    Consensus 4-8”+ albany to the coast, euro caved to gfs, Nashua (where I think you are?) is in a prime location. Contentious about NW extend of the goods and the r/s line (NW of Plymouth or not, and duration)
  14. Henry's Weather
    Book it… sorry Tblizz
  15. Henry's Weather
    Is this basically a bunch of simulations based on the relationship between GFS forecast data and observations?
  16. Henry's Weather
    SREF?
  17. Henry's Weather
    What the hell are you guys talking about?
  18. Henry's Weather
    A clear and damning trend
  19. Henry's Weather
    And even though the poles heat faster, as temp increases, the same delta T is a larger delta kinetic energy increase? Which means that delta Kinetic energy is higher, which means that the motive force for redistributing kinetic energy is higher -> faster circulation?
  20. Henry's Weather
    Mechanistically, how would CC cause a faster flow? Simply more kinetic energy available due to higher temps globally?
  21. Henry's Weather
    Yeah, reality can be negative for sure. Probably needs out-letting somewhere, relatively harmless to do so (not saying you do it in particular) on an online weather forum.
  22. Henry's Weather
    Better to be negative on here than with loved ones I bet
  23. Henry's Weather
    There isn’t the same disruption/collosus gravity as the big ones, but I love a good 4-8 storm or 3-6. The big ones take a huge emotional toll that doesn’t always pay off. The hard thing is that we never get those 3-6 deals anymore. It’s all coastals now
  24. Henry's Weather
    New NAM certainly has a slightly better orientation and more time to come up the coast. Verbatim will still miss
  25. Henry's Weather
    I’m not necessarily opposed to issuing alerts about high-potential systems far in advance. I’m sure it wasn’t intended to be similar in kind to the NWS’s old blizzard watches. No clue if this guy sucks or whatever, but I feel like the idea is fine
×
×
  • Create New...