Jump to content

Henry's Weather

Members
  • Posts

    1,479
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Henry's Weather

  1. No doubt. We certainly won't make as much use for QPF as Feb 2013 did
  2. I'm thinking that of all the big dogs synoptically, Feb 2013 might be an excellent match: (antecendent cold nonwithstanding)
  3. With the boob phenomenon, this gets complex, but still can clearly see consensus on a capture and loop near the cape
  4. Would be cool to see a true rain to pounding snow event... not common these days
  5. Yes, it's a balance between maintaining credibility and giving crews enough time. Logistically speaking, this winter has not required much salt and the like, so maybe less time is needed
  6. "Objective" is different than being responsible for damage-control. The NWS can't forecast a snowy solution for borderline areas because they are responsible for public works' mobilization, not because they are strictly following guidance. Strict adherence to guidance = "objective", only yields a snowier forecast than the one they put out. They are more conservative not for the purpose of fundamental accuracy, but for risk management at this distance
  7. Such a cool system, stepping aside from IMBY insecurities. Pinwheels and pinwheels
  8. It is nice though to see that we still certainly need highly discerning meteorologists to interpret computer outputs.
  9. My God, I'd hate to have to make a forecast for the general public on this one.
  10. All in all, we can see that the envelope of possibilities is still very wide. Going to probably be another 24 hours before more clarity emerges
  11. Verbatim, that's a bunch of CCB all the way back to the river, perhaps even further
×
×
  • Create New...