Jump to content

CheeselandSkies

Members
  • Posts

    3,243
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CheeselandSkies

  1. It's sunny but not warm enough yet, there hasn't been nor is there the slightest hint of a severe weather threat anywhere in the nation in the near term; next week's system(s) look to be moisture-starved because somehow cold fronts are still scouring the Gulf even though we got rid of the abominable cold air over a week ago.

    There's my complaint.

    • Like 1
  2. You can tell there is not enough going on with the weather again. :rolleyes: This thread was a lot slower during the epic winter stretch Jan-Feb.

    It's nice but not nice enough to do much outside unless you're a die-hard...that should change by Sunday. Still need some :twister: potential to track.

    • Like 1
  3. 29 minutes ago, nrgjeff said:

    Weekend was interesting along an east-west boundary. Thankfully it' didn't March 2-3, 2020 again.

    Mid-Range the weekly models have shown that trough west with low SER look mid-month; and, operational models are similar now in the 11-15 day period. Weeks 2-3 are the edge of any forecast value; but, it's nice they agree. Forecast AO/NAO is positive. Bering Sea ridge (not Alaska) could anchor the downstream Rockies to Plains trough. Get thunderstorms going Mid-South to Ohio Valley?

    Severe Season overall I'm somewhat bullish, but not crazy lit. I see La Nina hanging in there. It's not a pure La Nina resurgence since it's still first year, but it has that bullish lean for severe. Recent MJO activity and Kelvin wave placement in the Tropical Pacific has juiced the La Nina status (esp 3.4 region). +TNI is in question. Right off South America (region 1&2) is still cool. It had been warning up; but, the said activity impacted the whole basin. If 1&2 can warm to near or above normal, while 3.4 stays cooler than normal, then we have +TNI flavor. Either are bullish. Missing one should not be bearish if the other holds.

    Finally got a chance to compare La Nina flavors, and I think this year is closer to 2012 and 2008 than 2011. The latter was a true resurgent La Nina second year, strongest correlation with severe; but, we are still first year. However 2021 looks more active than 2017 or 2018, weaker or weakening La Ninas. 2021 is La Nina hanging in, not technically resurgent, but holding well.

    Very interesting pair of analogs because those years behaved very differently during the spring and summer here in the upper Midwest. Very wet/stormy with numerous tornadoes and widespread flooding problems ('08) vs. exceedingly warm and dry ('12).

    • Like 1
  4. Not a lot of significant precip in the 7-day. Had thought as of a week or two ago, there was a more active look for March? :blink: At the rate this melt is going, we are going to need to start seeing some rain or we will be looking at the risk of drought, as opposed to the spring flooding potential we were concerned about awhile ago.

    I swear last year it took until well into May to so much as hear a rumble of thunder around here, which made the early, agonizing weeks of the pandemic/lockdown all the more frustrating.

  5. 52 minutes ago, roardog said:

    So severe weather season is a dud because the first couple of weeks of March look less than ideal? This is like all of the talk in here about snow futility records last December. This is the first spring in a long time that has a decent looking -PDO. I think we should give it a chance.

    Oh, I'm more than happy to give it a chance, but the last few years have significantly tempered my optimism/expectations going into spring.

  6. I used to discount early season setups at this latitude out of hand (given that we can have low-level instability issues into late May), but events like 4/9/15, 3/15/16 and 2/28/17 have given me a new respect for them. Heck, we've done better in oddball "off-season" months (even including 12/1/18) in recent years than we have in May and June. Last year also had that late March potential big day that largely busted, but still produced a few tornadoes.

    • Like 1
  7. 8 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

    It's early but I'd be surprised if it's not a warmer than average summer.  If the areas upstream are in drought (and expands into the Plains), then it raises the odds of generating some intensely hot airmasses out there.  Whether or not we actually get into a technical drought in this part of the country, even a few weeks of relative drying out would make it more likely that some of that intense heat would spill eastward.

    The good news is we are going into spring with a healthy (in fact for some, record) snowpack in place, as opposed to 2011-12 when the entire central CONUS dried to a crisp and started to bake in March and never stopped until almost fall.

    I have to think that the recent winter storms in the southern Plains will help as well, since it's unusual for them to be going into spring with any snowpack at all in place, isn't it?

    • Like 1
  8. 12 minutes ago, madwx said:

    waiting for the official number but looks like we got down to -12 or -13 this morning.  Just short of the record again.  We just had the 7th coldest first half of February for MSN.  Looking forward to the slow climb out of this now.  The cold has overstayed its welcome.

    For me it had already overstayed its welcome when it first showed up on the GFS and Euro inside of "probably a mirage" range.

    • Like 1
  9. 10 hours ago, madwx said:

    Fairly consistent signal of temps around freezing by next weekend and then periods of above average temps after that.  The 20s next week will feel like a heat wave 

    Passed a dude wearing shorts in the hall of my apartment building yesterday...hopefully he was just heading to the little gym we have but you never know around here. :facepalm:

×
×
  • Create New...