Jump to content

RDRY

Members
  • Posts

    771
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RDRY

  1. At 48 hours, it's 5 MB stronger and a bit more north, but the precip shield is less expansive. Odd. Maybe it's more occluded.
  2. Here's hoping this GFS run ingests bad initialization data, and is discarded.
  3. Looks like the Berks get in on some decent wraparound snows and probably some upslope with the NAM -- the upper levels looked better than 6z, but the surface didn't really reflect it.
  4. Such a touchy setup. SW in California; PV dropping south; speed, depth and orientation of the trough; surface placement of the coastal low. Any of them with major downstream impacts. And still enough lead time.
  5. Is this really a significant model failure? 60+ hours out, they sampled the California energy slightly different, which cut it off from the emerging trough, so the trough doesn't dig as far south, doesn't sharpen up as much, and the storm develops a few hundred miles east.
  6. Indeed. But it looks like the GFS surface is not quite in sync with its upper levels.
  7. GFS is a stubborn SOB. Takes its sweet time getting there.
  8. Too bad the surface low isn't placed on that closed contour to its west.
  9. Southwest energy held back a bit more on this EURO run. Could be trouble.
  10. Not as good as 6z with the southern energy, but certainly better than 12z. Actually, at 96 hours, this looks almost exactly the same as yesterday's 0z.
  11. All that energy getting dumped into a pretty confined space.
  12. Reality being the very next model run.
×
×
  • Create New...