LibertyBell

what drought? there hasn't been a drought here since 2002? We dont need a single drop of rain

invoking mythology lol

Population reduction would be better for the planet

These communities need to be prevented from being able to oppose this....and why are they opposed to solar and hydroelectric? I don't get that at all.

he doesn't seem to be pro renewable all the way, he seems to like methane as a bridge fuel.

Fusion will be ready within our lifetimes, it's like creating our own suns, why get power from 93 million miles away when you can make a small star right on our own planet!

You don't think nuclear fusion is the solution either? Based on what I've been reading, controllable nuclear fusion should be ready within the next few decades. Methane isn't part of the solution dude, the fossil fuel cartels need to be removed from the equation.

I've been holding fast to 2-3, and 2 in most cases. Hopefully that's good enough.

What about hydroelectric?

I graded it a C for here, because although there were two decent storms (one 6" and one 12"+) the total snowfall was right around average (being between NYC and the places east of here who got the 2 foot amounts). Even if we had gotten the 2 foot snowfall back here, it would in no way have been an all timer, as Jan 2016 was FAR superior to it in many ways (not just the 30"+ snowfall, but also for duration of 30 hours and wind and verified blizzard conditions for 12 straight hours.)

Are these all at airports? It makes me wonder if we can get official weather reporting locations outside of airports in other parts of the country not completely covered by airports. Like the north shore of Long Island and the south shore of Nassau County locally.

Actually I don't know how they look but others have posted how they look in screenshots. Which is why I've decided to limit myself. My main problem with the multiquote issue is when talking about different things in the same thread, it has an awkward look when everything is posted on in a single post. I've done that before and read back the post and it's hard to follow a train of thought if let's say half a dozen different things are being talked about in the same post. I have to click back to see what each part of the post was in response to. Single posts can have a similar issue when talking about separate things in the same thread but at least if you're following a single conversation within the thread it's less distracting. But I see when it gets to a lot of consecutive posts it's self-defeating. And to Mr Gravity, I never said he in particular was stupid, I just think it's an odd thing to complain about, if it's just a few posts, but if it's say half a dozen or a dozen posts I understand-- and I lose track of how many I make after awhile. Which is why I think self-limiting to 2-3 is a far better idea.

On the trajectory we're on right now it's going to be difficult to avoid 2.0C, let alone 1.5C. I think the current best estimate is for 2.2C warming? And why are nations like China on a spending spree for building more coal plants? Hopefully they see the light soon.

Thats probably what they have at my other place then. 2000 ft but south of I-80.

Fracking and all that it entails are huge environmental issues and I don't want to give the fossil fuel cartels a leg to stand on. This is more than just about climate, it's also about health issues and ethics. If anything the fossil fuel cartels are worse than the tobacco cartels.

I can. I don't see a problem with making multiple posts because I read from a computer. I don't use (nor have) a cellphone period. So I decided to self limit to 2 or max 3 posts in a row, that's it.

where does nuclear fit in here? why not substitute nuclear for methane (what you call "natural" gas)-- I have major issues with methane and it's definitely not clean. I'd far rather have more nuclear plants and ban all fossil fuels entirely

The bad part is, although the developed world has been the major reason for the climate crisis, it's the developing world that's going to pay the most for it. We'll be okay-- we can absorb the costs, but what they will pay will set them back by decades. In the long run it will be better for them of course, but in the short term they will face a lot of issues.

There's been people asking me why they don't just take water from the Pacific, distill it, and use that lol.

the wind by itself was enough to qualify for severe weather here-- I thought my windows were going to blow in-- winds over 60 mph

we need to look at it more as a rapid warming of the west pac not a la nina

too humid, Arizona is better

why are la ninas more common than el nino?

It's for lazy people who use cellphones Here's my position on it-- if you're too lazy to read 10-20 posts in a row, then you're also too lazy to be on a weather forum. I read 400-500 pages a day on various subjects and I have no sympathy for people who complain about having to read a few extra posts. Maybe if their IQ was higher they'd actually enjoy reading more. People with IQ under 140 need not apply. I have zero interest in limiting myself because of the desire of others. I agreed on a compromise which I'm willing to accept-- which is make 2-3 posts in a row and that's it. I'm way too busy to be around long enough to make a lot of posts anyway, I'm working on Book 3 of a series on quantum mechanics and the multiverse and also working on a science documentary that's now over 80 hours long. So late nights only.

No, I just love the extra exposure lol