The 4 Seasons

Who's in Carver

Where is here again

found it, 82" on Mar 1st, 5N Bourne.

If anyone here has a total for Plymouth county that would help, i got you in Mattapoisett MPM. I know theres a large area over 72" just need some numbers if possible

Someone said 64.9 in Bristol and i wrote it down, now i dont know if it was Bristol, RI or CT, and i cant find it. If you see this let me know.

yeah cocorahs like irishrob said, it leaves out a lot reports that are missing days as well. It also only lets you do 90 days max so you can't include november and when we get into late march and want to include that, you'll be missing a lot of december

i have to leave all the cocorahs and coop stuff out of Plymouth county because its all below 60" and missing lots of days and the map the NWS has 72"+ for that whole area basically which seems right but i just cant include any numbers, sucks. @ORH_wxman would you say you have over or under 60" bc the Holliston cocorahs is 48.8 and that seems low and the other cocorahs is way too low at 27.8. Im going to lean over 60". The red on this map is 48-72" but i have that split up.

Third and hopefully final update to the Blizzard of 2026. I made a bunch of small changes and removed/added some numbers. Biggest change was to update LGA from 22.5 to 23.4. Everything's updated on site. Radar/other stuff in its own page coming today or tomorrow whenever NCEP updates.

Third and hopefully final update to the Blizzard of 2026. I made a bunch of small changes and removed/added some numbers. Biggest change was to update LGA from 22.5 to 23.4. Everything's updated on site. Radar/other stuff in its own page coming today or tomorrow whenever NCEP updates.

if you want to, id need it in like the next few hours. but if its missing a bunch of small stuff then dont bother, i think theres cocorahs in weymouth i can use. or at least surrounding areas.

who the hell would want to mod-admin for that? sounds like a nightmare waiting to happen

There used to be a whole forum dedicated to it called American Politics but i think its completely gone, it started around covid times 2020ish. I think. I was on there for a minute but im pretty sure its wiped.

The caterpillar has turned

Unless you get a late April 2020 or 2021 freak 6"+ event. I'm willing to bet you get 1 or 2 more accumulating events but deep winter is certainly over.

so you didnt get anything yesterday??

melting snow on the sensors...

got it, i thought about that for a sec but nothing indicated sarcasm, over txt it can be hard to tell sometimes.

and why is getting model data later a good thing?

Didn't realize LGA changed their number from 22.5 to 23.4. I'll have to fix that in the map

you have a season to date total 65.25 on the sig is right? @Damage In Tolland as well

I got this steel ruler thats divided into 10ths which is great for measuring snow especially in smaller events so you dont have to guestimate or round. It's on amazon for about 20$ real weenie stuff

whereabouts, you dont have to give me your exact coordinates just north, south, central etc

I think coating-2 worked out fine for CT, most were in the C-1 range, but up to 2 covers the 1"+ amounts u have a season total

I don't doubt that at all. I plot and do all the contours by hand for every storm. I don't have software to feed in a bunch of data and auto generate a snowfall map from averaged/smoothed data. A lot of the NESIS maps are conservative and in some cases way too conservative like February 2013 where there is no 30"+ area over CT despite a very large area and many many reports of 30-40". @ORH_wxman can attest to that, we were talking about that a few weeks ago. That's just one example. So i knew the NESIS map would be a bit lower/conservative, every map is going to look a bit different. However even with that being said there are some glaringly obvious problems with the current storm. There is a small area of 4-10" near Danbury which i am certain was well over 10" being on the eastern edge of that deformation band. Most of the reports around there are 17-22" and on the low end 12-15" so there's no reason why a hole of sub 10" should be there. Just one example. The area of 20-30" should also be much wider over NJ west and south of NYC, even with smoothing considered, many reports of 20-30" in Monmouth and Ocean counties away from the immediate shore.