Jump to content

The 4 Seasons

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    7,954
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by The 4 Seasons

  1. 3.5" 1.2" last 30 minutes 2.1" last hour
  2. plant the flag its absolutely puking here, some of the heaviest ive seen probably since 2/7/21
  3. Definitely S+ now. 2 per hour rates. large flake size
  4. thats good, 2/7/21 storm you were smoking exhaust up there and i thought youd be doing the same with this one based on radar.
  5. 0.9/30 minutes. 1.8" per hour rate. 2.3"
  6. bottom range is definitely a lock here, got a shot at the upper end near 8. Radar update.
  7. 1.4" in about one hour roughly not exact. Heavy snow. Rates are in the 1-2 range. Will measure again in one hour.
  8. Mod boarderlihe heavy, great flakes size. Beautiful
  9. No, we are indeed two different people,but work together. Along with another met here on the board. But I did that graphic, so it was a joke he just posted it for me. We work on the fx together though
  10. That was only last year, the storm I've been referencing a few times. Most fx were 4-8. The duration was short. 9a-4p here.
  11. I was getting deja vu with some of these maps so i went back and looked through Feb 7th 2021. Had to share these striking similarities at the surface from models from the Feb 7th 2021 nor'easter. 21 left/22 right
  12. Anyone else noticed that almost all NCEP data has halted at 12Z for NAM/GFS/HRRR. All the sites that have graphics for these models seem to be working fine but everything that has point data, bufkit data, banding hasnt updated since 12Z in most cases. BUFKIT data is all stopped around 12Z: PSU Bufkit Data Distribution Coolwx has nothing for the HRRR/NAM/GFS since 12Z, GFS has 00Z but no 18Z NCEP Model Time-Series (BUFR) Forecast Hourly Weather Data (coolwx.com) this site i use for banding hasnt updated NAM since 12Z moe.met.fsu.edu/banding/ Also i noticed when i click on TT for a sounding it says "model run not available" even though the graphics are available.
  13. I can't speak for recent models i.e. 0z/6z but when I looked at 12z gfs/Nam I noticed the dgz was pretty narrow and realitively low with the best lift above it. At least for the CT sites I looked at. I saw a post from oceanstwx about it earlier. What are your thoughts? I imagine the better runs like the 3k Nam and hrrr look better.
×
×
  • Create New...